Literature DB >> 18625292

Altruism among relatives and non-relatives.

Howard Rachlin1, Bryan A Jones.   

Abstract

Hamilton's [Hamilton, W.D., 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior, I, II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1-52] kin-selection theory predicts that altruism will be greater with greater genetic overlap (degree of kinship) between giver and receiver. Kin may be identified in terms of social distance-the closer you feel to someone else, (a) the greater your genetic overlap with them should be, and (b) the more altruistic you should be toward them. The present experiment determined the amount of their own (hypothetical) monetary reward undergraduates were willing to forgo in order to give $75 to other people at various social distances. We found that (a) genetic relationship and (b) altruism varied inversely with social distance; the closer you feel to someone else, the closer their relation to you is likely to be, and the more altruistic you are likely to be toward them. However, even at the same social distance, participants were willing to forgo significantly more money for the benefit of relatives than for the benefit of non-relatives. These results are consistent with kin-selection theory and imply that altruism is determined by factors in addition to social distance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18625292      PMCID: PMC2561243          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  8 in total

Review 1.  Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes.

Authors:  W K Bickel; L A Marsch
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 2.  The nature of human altruism.

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Urs Fischbacher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Andrea M Begotka; Bethany R Raiff; Lana L Kastern
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Notes on discounting.

Authors:  Howard Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Social discounting.

Authors:  Bryan Jones; Howard Rachlin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-04

7.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 8.  Altruism and selfishness.

Authors:  Howard Rachlin
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 12.579

  8 in total
  25 in total

Review 1.  A behavioral analysis of altruism.

Authors:  Howard Rachlin; Matthew Locey
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Revisiting Psychological Mechanisms in the Anthropology of Altruism.

Authors:  Joseph Hackman; Shirajum Munira; Khaleda Jasmin; Daniel Hruschka
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

3.  SOCIAL DISCOUNTING AND CIGARETTE SMOKING DURING PREGNANCY.

Authors:  Matthew P Bradstreet; Stephen T Higgins; Sarah H Heil; Gary J Badger; Joan M Skelly; Mary Ellen Lynch; Molly C Trayah
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2011-08-12

4.  Altruism and anonymity: A behavioral analysis.

Authors:  Matthew L Locey; Howard Rachlin
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  INTERTEMPORAL DECISION-MAKING FOR A GROUP.

Authors:  Richard Yi; Leila F King; Anne E Carter; Reid D Landes; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2010

6.  The Temporal Dynamics of Cooperation.

Authors:  Matthew L Locey; Howard Rachlin
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2011-01-24

7.  Social discounting involves modulation of neural value signals by temporoparietal junction.

Authors:  Tina Strombach; Bernd Weber; Zsofia Hangebrauk; Peter Kenning; Iliana I Karipidis; Philippe N Tobler; Tobias Kalenscher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Real and hypothetical rewards.

Authors:  Matthew L Locey; Bryan A Jones; Howard Rachlin
Journal:  Judgm Decis Mak       Date:  2011-08

9.  A study on the influencing factors of the public's willingness to donate funds for critical illness crowdfunding projects on network platforms.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Fan Luo; Wanshi He; Heng Zhao; Liru Pan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Decisions for others become less impulsive the further away they are on the family tree.

Authors:  Fenja V Ziegler; Richard J Tunney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.