Literature DB >> 18624892

Investigation into "normal" background DNA on adult necks: implications for DNA profiling of manual strangulation victims.

Eleanor Alison May Graham1, Guy Nathan Rutty.   

Abstract

Others have investigated the role that DNA profiling could play as a method for identifying the perpetrator of manual strangulation. These studies have demonstrated that it is possible to collect offender DNA from the skin surface of a victim following physical contact. It is not known whether nonself biological material is normally present on the skin surface due to adventitious transfer occurring during innocent everyday interactions. To test the hypothesis that detectable amounts of nonself DNA are normally present on the skin surface of healthy adult individuals due to the adventitious transfer of DNA occurring during normal day-to-day social interactions, we designed an experiment in three phases. Phase 1 was used to deduce which DNA collection, extraction, and amplification methods were suited to investigating this question. During phase 2, the neck surface of 24 healthy adult volunteers was swabbed. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA mini kit and amplified using the SGM Plus PCR amplification kit, using 28 PCR cycles. The work carried out during phase 3 involved a simulated assault to investigate primary and secondary transfer of DNA during physical contact. It was found that 23% of neck areas swabbed during phase 2 of this investigation showed nondonor alleles in the resulting DNA profile, with 5% of areas showing six or more nondonor alleles. The results of phase 3 showed that primary, secondary, and zero transfer of victim and/or offender DNA could be observed after physical contact and that alleles from an unknown source could still be detected in this more controlled experiment. The data presented in this paper demonstrate that DNA profiles generated after swabbing the skin surface of healthy adults can include components of an unknown source, present due to adventitious transfer. These components, if present in large quantities, have the potential to interfere with DNA profile interpretation of swabs taken for the investigation of physical assault by DNA profiling.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18624892     DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00800.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  6 in total

Review 1.  DNA reviews: low level DNA profiling.

Authors:  Eleanor A M Graham
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Persistence of touch DNA on burglary-related tools.

Authors:  Céline M Pfeifer; Peter Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 3.  The diversity of shedder tests and a novel factor that affects DNA transfer.

Authors:  Max Schwender; Malte Bamberg; Lisa Dierig; Sebastian N Kunz; Peter Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Evidence Collection and Analysis for Touch Deoxyribonucleic Acid in Groping and Sexual Assault Cases.

Authors:  Julie L Valentine; Paige Presler-Jur; Heather Mills; Suzanne Miles
Journal:  J Forensic Nurs       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 1.175

5.  Approach considerations for the management of strangulation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Samuel J Stellpflug; William Weber; Ann Dietrich; Brian Springer; Robin Polansky; Carolyn Sachs; Antony Hsu; Sarayna McGuire; Casey Gwinn; Gael Strack; Ralph Riviello
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-04-16

6.  Defining background DNA levels found on the skin of children aged 0-5 years.

Authors:  Eleanor Alison May Graham; William John Watkins; Frank Dunstan; Sabine Maguire; Diane Nuttall; Chloe Elizabeth Swinfield; Guy Nathan Rutty; Alison M Kemp
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.686

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.