Literature DB >> 1862429

Two-point fixation of the lumbar spine. Differential stability in rotation.

T A Zdeblick1, G R Smith, K E Warden, M B Eng, P C McAfee.   

Abstract

Single vertebral motion segments were tested in torsion. The adjacent vertebrae were transfixed by two 3-mm Steinman pins placed vertically. These were applied in five different positions: between the anterior vertebral bodies, posterior vertebral bodies, pedicles, transverse processes, and lamina. Rotational displacement was limited the most by transfixation between the vertebral bodies (position one or two). Disrupting the anulus fibrosus significantly increased rotation in all positions except those in the vertebral body. These findings may imply that spinal fixation devices that engage the vertebral bodies may offer inherent advantages over purely posterior devices in stabilizing a vertebral motion segment. In addition, an interbody arthrodesis may prevent intervertebral motion better than a posterior or posterolateral fusion.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1862429     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199106001-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  3 in total

1.  Lumbar segmental instability: Points to ponder.

Authors:  P Gopinath
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-08

2.  Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal.

Authors:  Christian H Flamme; Nadine von der Heide; Caroline Heymann; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Minimally invasive extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Federico Landriel; Santiago Hem; Jorge Rasmussen; Eduardo Vecchi; Claudio Yampolsky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-01-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.