Literature DB >> 1862420

Development of a prosthetic intervertebral disc.

C K Lee1, N A Langrana, J R Parsons, M C Zimmerman.   

Abstract

This article is a preliminary report of a 10-year investigation of the development of an intervertebral disc prosthesis. Spinal fusion is a method for the treatment of chronic, disabling low-back pain that does not respond to nonoperative treatments. Spinal fusion, however, has various adverse effects, and the results of spinal fusion are often unpredictable. The goal of this research project was to develop disc prostheses that have mechanical properties very similar to those of natural, normal discs. Two types of disc prosthesis, one with fiber-reinforced polyurethane and the other with multicomponent, non-fiber-reinforced polymers (C-Flex), have been designed and manufactured. The fiber-reinforced disc was made of polyurethane end-plates with A100 hardness, a homogenous nucleus with A40, and 12 layers of multidirectional (0, +45 degrees), fiber-reinforced anulus with A40 polyurethane. The design and modeling of the multicomponent polymers (non-fiber-reinforced) was made of C-Flex endplates with A90 hardness, a nucleus with A35 occupying 35% of the volume, and an anulus with 70A. Mechanical testing of these disc prostheses demonstrated similar mechanical properties to those of natural, normal discs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1862420     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199106001-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Nucleus disc arthroplasty with the NUBAC™ device: 2-year clinical experience.

Authors:  M Balsano; A Zachos; A Ruggiu; F Barca; P Tranquilli-Leali; C Doria
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Role of biomechanics in intervertebral disc degeneration and regenerative therapies: what needs repairing in the disc and what are promising biomaterials for its repair?

Authors:  James C Iatridis; Steven B Nicoll; Arthur J Michalek; Benjamin A Walter; Michelle S Gupta
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Clinical performance of an elastomeric lumbar disc replacement: Minimum 12 months follow-up.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Raul Springmuller; Casey K Lee; Leonardo Oliveira; Sandra E Roth; William F Ogilvie
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-03-01

4.  ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rolando Garcia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.