Literature DB >> 18621848

Comparison of the outcome and morbidity for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer treated by high-dose-rate brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) versus EBRT alone.

Fu-Min Fang1, Yu-Ming Wang, Chong-Jong Wang, Hsuan-Ying Huang, Po-Hui Chiang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival, gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer treated by high-dose-rate-brachytherapy (HDR-BT) plus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) versus EBRT alone at a single institute in Taiwan.
METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with T1c-T3b prostate cancer consecutively treated by EBRT alone (33 patients) or HDR-BT+EBRT (55 patients) were studied. The median dose of EBRT was 70.2 Gy in the EBRT group and 50.4 Gy in the HDR-BT group. HDR-BT was performed 2-3 weeks before EBRT, with 12.6 Gy in three fractions over 24 h.
RESULTS: Five patients (15.2%) in the EBRT group and seven (12.7%) in the HDR-BT group developed a biochemical relapse. The 5-year actuarial biochemical relapse-free survival rates were 65.0% in the EBRT group and 66.7% in the HDR-BT group (P = 0.76). The 5-year actuarial likelihood of late > or =Grade 2 and > or =Grade 3 GI toxicity in the EBRT versus HDR-BT group was 62.8 versus 7.7% (P < 0.001) and 19.6 versus 0% (P = 0.001), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the only predictor for late GI toxicity was the mode of RT. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of late > or =Grade 2 and > or =Grade 3 GU toxicity in the EBRT versus HDR-BT group was 14.8 versus 15.9% (P = 0.86) and 3.6 versus 8.5% (P = 0.40), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of HDR-BT before EBRT with a reduced dose from the EBRT produces a comparable survival outcome and GU toxicity but a significantly less GI toxicity for prostate cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18621848     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyn056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  Dosimetric evaluation of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost treatments for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Georgina Fröhlich; Péter Agoston; József Lövey; András Somogyi; János Fodor; Csaba Polgár; Tibor Major
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Can high-dose-rate brachytherapy prevent the major genitourinary complication better than external beam radiation alone for patients with previous transurethral resection of prostate?

Authors:  Hao Lun Luo; Fu Min Fang; Chih Hsiung Kang; Yao Chi Chuang; Po Hui Chiang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Comparison of tumor control and toxicity outcomes of high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy and brachytherapy for patients with favorable risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Yoshiya Yamada; Xin Pei; Margie Hunt; Gilad Cohen; Zhigang Zhang; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Biological dose summation of intensity-modulated arc therapy and image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Georgina Fröhlich; Péter Ágoston; Kliton Jorgo; Csaba Polgár; Tibor Major
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-06-30

5.  Comparative dosimetrical analysis of intensity-modulated arc therapy, CyberKnife therapy and image-guided interstitial HDR and LDR brachytherapy of low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Georgina Fröhlich; Péter Ágoston; Kliton Jorgo; Gábor Stelczer; Csaba Polgár; Tibor Major
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-04-14

6.  Comparative effectiveness of surgery and radiotherapy for survival of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: A population-based coarsened exact matching retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Masato Yasui; Masahiko Sakaguchi; Ryousuke Jikuya; Sohgo Tsutsumi; Tomoyuki Tatenuma; Go Noguchi; Susumu Umemoto; Kayako Katayama; Hiroto Narimatsu; Hiroji Uemura; Takeshi Kishida
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.967

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.