BACKGROUND: Successful therapeutic regimens in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) must balance efficacy and tolerability. Docetaxel/capecitabine is an active and commonly used doublet in this setting. Docetaxel upregulates thymidine phosphorylase and thus potentiates the antitumor effects of capecitabine. A schedule with split, low-dose docetaxel in combination with low-dose capecitabine could improve the therapeutic index of this regimen without compromising its clinical activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated HER2/neu-negative MBC were eligible. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 in combination with capecitabine 750 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle. Thirty-nine women were enrolled. Median age was 55 years (range, 36-75 years). Fourteen patients had triple-negative disease. Sites of metastasis were as follows: bone (n = 27); liver (n = 15); lung (n = 17); nonregional chest (n = 4); lymph nodes (n = 2); and skin (n = 1). Six patients had bone-only disease. All subjects had a performance status of 0/1. A total of 329 cycles were administered (median, 6; range, 1-50). RESULTS: Of 37 patients who received study treatment, 32 had evaluable disease, 1 had a complete response, and 15 had a partial response (overall response rate was 50% in evaluable patients and 43% in the intent-to-treat analysis). Six patients had stable disease. The overall clinical benefit rate was 69% for patients with evaluable disease and 60% overall. Fifteen patients had disease that progressed or had been withdrawn from study at the time of first evaluation. With a median follow-up of 25 months, median time to treatment failure was 4.25 months (95% CI, 1.5-7 months), and median overall survival has not yet been reached. Toxicity was moderate: 15 patients (41%) had grade 3/4 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Split, low-dose docetaxel and low-dose capecitabine is an active combination in the first-line treatment of patients with MBC. Toxicity with this schedule was manageable, making it an attractive regimen for further study in combination with targeted agents.
BACKGROUND: Successful therapeutic regimens in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) must balance efficacy and tolerability. Docetaxel/capecitabine is an active and commonly used doublet in this setting. Docetaxel upregulates thymidine phosphorylase and thus potentiates the antitumor effects of capecitabine. A schedule with split, low-dose docetaxel in combination with low-dose capecitabine could improve the therapeutic index of this regimen without compromising its clinical activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated HER2/neu-negative MBC were eligible. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 in combination with capecitabine 750 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle. Thirty-nine women were enrolled. Median age was 55 years (range, 36-75 years). Fourteen patients had triple-negative disease. Sites of metastasis were as follows: bone (n = 27); liver (n = 15); lung (n = 17); nonregional chest (n = 4); lymph nodes (n = 2); and skin (n = 1). Six patients had bone-only disease. All subjects had a performance status of 0/1. A total of 329 cycles were administered (median, 6; range, 1-50). RESULTS: Of 37 patients who received study treatment, 32 had evaluable disease, 1 had a complete response, and 15 had a partial response (overall response rate was 50% in evaluable patients and 43% in the intent-to-treat analysis). Six patients had stable disease. The overall clinical benefit rate was 69% for patients with evaluable disease and 60% overall. Fifteen patients had disease that progressed or had been withdrawn from study at the time of first evaluation. With a median follow-up of 25 months, median time to treatment failure was 4.25 months (95% CI, 1.5-7 months), and median overall survival has not yet been reached. Toxicity was moderate: 15 patients (41%) had grade 3/4 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Split, low-dose docetaxel and low-dose capecitabine is an active combination in the first-line treatment of patients with MBC. Toxicity with this schedule was manageable, making it an attractive regimen for further study in combination with targeted agents.
Authors: S-E Al-Batran; M Güntner; C Pauligk; M Scholz; R Chen; B Beiss; S Stopatschinskaja; W Lerbs; N Harbeck; E Jäger Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Anja Kraemer; Stefan Hauser; Young Kim; Marcus Gorschlüter; Stefan C Müller; Peter Brossart; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2009-06-10