T Peikert1, C E Daniels, T J Beebe, K C Meyer, J H Ryu. 1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Mayo Building East 18, Rochester, MN, USA. peikert.tobias@mayo.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The consensus statement on the Diagnosis and Therapy of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) formulated by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) was published in 2000. Acceptance and implementation of these guidelines have not been assessed. We surveyed the fellows of the American College of Chest Physicians (FCCP) to establish current practice patterns regarding the diagnosis and therapy of IPF. METHODS: We electronically distributed a 32-item questionnaire to all 6443 pulmonary medicine board-certified Fellows of the American College of Chest Physicians. The response rate was 13%. Demographic characteristics were similar between respondents and non-respondents. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of respondents were familiar with the ATS/ERS consensus statement and 63% found it clinically useful. However, a similar number of respondents indicated that an update is needed. Bronchoscopy and surgical lung biopsy are used infrequently. Forty-five percent of pulmonary physicians advocate providing only supportive care for patients outside of clinical trials. If pharmacological therapy is recommended, prednisone (either alone or in combination with azathioprine) or off-label agents are preferentially prescribed. Despite physician awareness (79%) of clinical trials, interested patients are not consistently referred (54%). A majority of respondents (61%) felt that lung transplantation represents the only effective therapy for IPF, and 86% refer their patients to lung transplant centers. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability among pulmonary physicians in the diagnosis and management of IPF. This may, in part, reflect the current lack of effective pharmacologic therapy. Updated practice guidelines are needed for the diagnosis and therapy of IPF.
BACKGROUND: The consensus statement on the Diagnosis and Therapy of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) formulated by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) was published in 2000. Acceptance and implementation of these guidelines have not been assessed. We surveyed the fellows of the American College of Chest Physicians (FCCP) to establish current practice patterns regarding the diagnosis and therapy of IPF. METHODS: We electronically distributed a 32-item questionnaire to all 6443 pulmonary medicine board-certified Fellows of the American College of Chest Physicians. The response rate was 13%. Demographic characteristics were similar between respondents and non-respondents. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of respondents were familiar with the ATS/ERS consensus statement and 63% found it clinically useful. However, a similar number of respondents indicated that an update is needed. Bronchoscopy and surgical lung biopsy are used infrequently. Forty-five percent of pulmonary physicians advocate providing only supportive care for patients outside of clinical trials. If pharmacological therapy is recommended, prednisone (either alone or in combination with azathioprine) or off-label agents are preferentially prescribed. Despite physician awareness (79%) of clinical trials, interested patients are not consistently referred (54%). A majority of respondents (61%) felt that lung transplantation represents the only effective therapy for IPF, and 86% refer their patients to lung transplant centers. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability among pulmonary physicians in the diagnosis and management of IPF. This may, in part, reflect the current lack of effective pharmacologic therapy. Updated practice guidelines are needed for the diagnosis and therapy of IPF.
Authors: Ganesh Raghu; Kevin J Anstrom; Talmadge E King; Joseph A Lasky; Fernando J Martinez Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francesca Gorini; Michele Santoro; Anna Pierini; Lorena Mezzasalma; Silvia Baldacci; Elena Bargagli; Alessandra Boncristiano; Maurizia Rossana Brunetto; Paolo Cameli; Francesco Cappelli; Giancarlo Castaman; Barbara Coco; Maria Alice Donati; Renzo Guerrini; Silvia Linari; Vittoria Murro; Iacopo Olivotto; Paola Parronchi; Francesca Pochiero; Oliviero Rossi; Barbara Scappini; Andrea Sodi; Alessandro Maria Vannucchi; Alessio Coi Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 5.988
Authors: Brian J Bartholmai; Sushravya Raghunath; Ronald A Karwoski; Teng Moua; Srinivasan Rajagopalan; Fabien Maldonado; Paul A Decker; Richard A Robb Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Fernando J Martinez; Joao A de Andrade; Kevin J Anstrom; Talmadge E King; Ganesh Raghu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jürgen Behr; Michael Kreuter; Marius M Hoeper; Hubert Wirtz; Jens Klotsche; Dirk Koschel; Stefan Andreas; Martin Claussen; Christian Grohé; Henrike Wilkens; Winfried Randerath; Dirk Skowasch; F Joachim Meyer; Joachim Kirschner; Sven Gläser; Felix J F Herth; Tobias Welte; Rudolf Maria Huber; Claus Neurohr; Martin Schwaiblmair; Martin Kohlhäufl; Gert Höffken; Matthias Held; Andrea Koch; Thomas Bahmer; David Pittrow Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Eun Jung Choi; Gong Yong Jin; Se Mi Bok; Young Min Han; Young Sun Lee; Myung Ja Jung; Keun Sang Kwon Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 3.500