Literature DB >> 18621062

Quantifying the complexity of bat wing kinematics.

Daniel K Riskin1, David J Willis, José Iriarte-Díaz, Tyson L Hedrick, Mykhaylo Kostandov, Jian Chen, David H Laidlaw, Kenneth S Breuer, Sharon M Swartz.   

Abstract

Body motions (kinematics) of animals can be dimensionally complex, especially when flexible parts of the body interact with a surrounding fluid. In these systems, tracking motion completely can be difficult, and result in a large number of correlated measurements, with unclear contributions of each parameter to performance. Workers typically get around this by deciding a priori which variables are important (wing camber, stroke amplitude, etc.), and focusing only on those variables, but this constrains the ability of a study to uncover variables of influence. Here, we describe an application of proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) for assigning importances to kinematic variables, using dimensional complexity as a metric. We apply this method to bat flight kinematics, addressing three questions: (1) Does dimensional complexity of motion change with speed? (2) What body markers are optimal for capturing dimensional complexity? (3) What variables should a simplified reconstruction of bat flight include in order to maximally reconstruct actual dimensional complexity? We measured the motions of 17 kinematic markers (20 joint angles) on a bat (Cynopterus brachyotis) flying in a wind tunnel at nine speeds. Dimensional complexity did not change with flight speed, despite changes in the kinematics themselves, suggesting that the relative efficacy of a given number of dimensions for reconstructing kinematics is conserved across speeds. By looking at subsets of the full 17-marker set, we found that using more markers improved resolution of kinematic dimensional complexity, but that the benefit of adding markers diminished as the total number of markers increased. Dimensional complexity was highest when the hindlimb and several points along digits III and IV were tracked. Also, we uncovered three groups of joints that move together during flight by using POD to quantify correlations of motion. These groups describe 14/20 joint angles, and provide a framework for models of bat flight for experimental and modeling purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18621062     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  22 in total

1.  Tight coordination of aerial flight maneuvers and sonar call production in insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Joseph Kasnadi; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Lift enhancement by bats' dynamically changing wingspan.

Authors:  Shizhao Wang; Xing Zhang; Guowei He; Tianshu Liu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Somatosensory substrates of flight control in bats.

Authors:  Kara L Marshall; Mohit Chadha; Laura A deSouza; Susanne J Sterbing-D'Angelo; Cynthia F Moss; Ellen A Lumpkin
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Localization of magnetic pills.

Authors:  Bryan Laulicht; Nicholas J Gidmark; Anubhav Tripathi; Edith Mathiowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The influence of aspect ratio and stroke pattern on force generation of a bat-inspired membrane wing.

Authors:  Cosima Schunk; Sharon M Swartz; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Bat echolocation calls facilitate social communication.

Authors:  Mirjam Knörnschild; Kirsten Jung; Martina Nagy; Markus Metz; Elisabeth Kalko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Simplifying a wing: diversity and functional consequences of digital joint reduction in bat wings.

Authors:  Joseph W Bahlman; Rosalyn M Price-Waldman; Hannah W Lippe; Kenneth S Breuer; Sharon M Swartz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Trend-Centric Motion Visualization: Designing and Applying a New Strategy for Analyzing Scientific Motion Collections.

Authors:  David Schroeder; Fedor Korsakov; Carissa Mai-Ping Knipe; Lauren Thorson; Arin M Ellingson; David Nuckley; John Carlis; Daniel F Keefe
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.579

9.  Modelled three-dimensional suction accuracy predicts prey capture success in three species of centrarchid fishes.

Authors:  Emily A Kane; Timothy E Higham
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Motor output and control input in flapping flight: a compact model of the deforming wing kinematics of manoeuvring hoverflies.

Authors:  Indira Nagesh; Simon M Walker; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.