Literature DB >> 18620723

An improved automatic time-of-flight picker for medical ultrasound tomography.

Cuiping Li1, Lianjie Huang, Nebojsa Duric, Haijiang Zhang, Charlotte Rowe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND
MOTIVATION: Time-of-flight (TOF) tomography used by a clinical ultrasound tomography device can efficiently and reliably produce sound-speed images of the breast for cancer diagnosis. Accurate picking of TOFs of transmitted ultrasound signals is extremely important to ensure high-resolution and high-quality ultrasound sound-speed tomograms. Since manually picking is time-consuming for large datasets, we developed an improved automatic TOF picker based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC), as described in this paper.
METHODS: We make use of an approach termed multi-model inference (model averaging), based on the calculated AIC values, to improve the accuracy of TOF picks. By using multi-model inference, our picking method incorporates all the information near the TOF of ultrasound signals. Median filtering and reciprocal pair comparison are also incorporated in our AIC picker to effectively remove outliers.
RESULTS: We validate our AIC picker using synthetic ultrasound waveforms, and demonstrate that our automatic TOF picker can accurately pick TOFs in the presence of random noise with absolute amplitudes up to 80% of the maximum absolute signal amplitude. We apply the new method to 1160 in vivo breast ultrasound waveforms, and compare the picked TOFs with manual picks and amplitude threshold picks. The mean value and standard deviation between our TOF picker and manual picking are 0.4 micros and 0.29 micros, while for amplitude threshold picker the values are 1.02 micros and 0.9 micros, respectively. Tomograms for in vivo breast data with high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) ( approximately 25 dB) and low SNR ( approximately 18 dB) clearly demonstrate that our AIC picker is much less sensitive to the SNRs of the data, compared to the amplitude threshold picker. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: The picking routine developed here is aimed at determining reliable quantitative values, necessary for adding diagnostic information to our clinical ultrasound tomography device--CURE. It has been successfully adopted into CURE, and allows us to generate such values reliably. We demonstrate that in vivo sound-speed tomograms with our TOF picks significantly improve the reconstruction accuracy and reduce image artifacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18620723      PMCID: PMC3915524          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  5 in total

1.  Strategies for reliable automatic onset time picking of acoustic emissions and of ultrasound signals in concrete.

Authors:  Jochen H Kurz; Christian U Grosse; Hans-Wolf Reinhardt
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2004-12-25       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Development of ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: technical assessment.

Authors:  Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Alex Babkin; David Chambers; Stephen Azevedo; Roman Pevzner; Mikhail Tokarev; Earle Holsapple; Olsi Rama; Robert Duncan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: first results with the Computed Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (CURE) prototype.

Authors:  Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lou Poulo; Alex Babkin; Roman Pevzner; Earle Holsapple; Olsi Rama; Carri Glide
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Ultrasonic reflectivity tomography: reconstruction with circular transducer arrays.

Authors:  S J Norton; M Linzer
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  Breast imaging in coronal planes with simultaneous pulse echo and transmission ultrasound.

Authors:  P L Carson; C R Meyer; A L Scherzinger; T V Oughton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  First-arrival traveltime sound speed inversion with a priori information.

Authors:  Fong Ming Hooi; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Breast density measurements with ultrasound tomography: a comparison with film and digital mammography.

Authors:  Neb Duric; Norman Boyd; Peter Littrup; Mark Sak; Lukasz Myc; Cuiping Li; Erik West; Sal Minkin; Lisa Martin; Martin Yaffe; Steven Schmidt; Muhammad Faiz; Jason Shen; Olga Melnichouk; Qing Li; Teri Albrecht
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Adaptive dual-speed ultrasound and photoacoustic computed tomography.

Authors:  Yachao Zhang; Lidai Wang
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  Waveform inversion with source encoding for breast sound speed reconstruction in ultrasound computed tomography.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Thomas Matthews; Fatima Anis; Cuiping Li; Neb Duric; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography.

Authors:  Cuiping Li; Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lianjie Huang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Transmission-reflection optoacoustic ultrasound (TROPUS) computed tomography of small animals.

Authors:  Elena Merčep; Joaquín L Herraiz; Xosé Luís Deán-Ben; Daniel Razansky
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 17.782

8.  Zone-Shrinking Fresnel Zone Travel-Time Tomography for Sound Speed Reconstruction in Breast USCT.

Authors:  Xiaoyue Fang; Yun Wu; Junjie Song; Hang Yin; Liang Zhou; Qiude Zhang; Zhaohui Quan; Mingyue Ding; Ming Yuchi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.