Literature DB >> 18619990

Profiles and levels of fatty acid esters of okadaic acid group toxins and pectenotoxins during toxin depuration. Part II: blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and flat oyster (Ostrea edulis).

Trine Torgersen1, Morten Sandvik, Bengt Lundve, Susanne Lindegarth.   

Abstract

Bivalve molluscs accumulate toxins of the okadaic acid (OA) and pectenotoxin (PTX) groups, which are frequently found in Dinophysis spp. Transformation of the OA-group toxins into fatty acid ester derivatives (often designated "DTX3") is common in many bivalve species but the degree to which these toxins are transformed vary between species, and is also depending on the parent toxin involved. In this paper, detailed profiles and levels of fatty acid esters of OA, DTX1, DTX2 and PTX2 SA were studied in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and European flat oysters (Ostrea edulis), collected during a bloom of Dinophysis spp. and after 3 and 6 weeks of depuration. Analysis of samples by HPLC-MS/MS and HPLC-MS(2) revealed some differences in identity and abundance of fatty acid moieties of the OA-group esters between species, but the 16:0 fatty acid esters dominated in both oysters and mussels, which is in accordance with the free fatty acid profiles in these species. A wider range of PTX2 SA-esters were detected compared to esters of the OA-group toxins in both mussels and oysters, and in oysters, both 14:0, 18:4 and 20:5 fatty acid side chains were more common than 16:0. OA-group toxins were esterified to a larger degree in oysters (83-93%) compared to mussels (21-41%), and in mussels a higher proportion of OA was esterified compared to DTX1 and DTX2. Contrary to what was observed for OA-group toxins, PTX2 SA was esterified to a larger degree in mussels (81%) compared to oysters (64%). Calculations of depuration rates for all individual esters of each parent compound showed that the esters of DTX1 depurated significantly slower from both mussels and oysters compared to esters of OA, DTX2 and PTX2 SA, but overall the depuration rates of esters of both toxin group were highly similar for both species. This indicated that differences in depuration rates are not causing the large species-specific differences in levels and profiles of these toxins. Instead, the results for the OA-group toxins suggested that a higher rate of esterification in oysters is the main factor causing the observed differences in the proportion of esters to free toxin. For PTX2 SA, large differences in ester profiles and a higher proportion of esters of PTX2 SA in mussels compared to oysters suggested differential assimilation and metabolic rate processes for the PTXs compared to OA-group toxins between these species. Hence, although produced by the same Dinophysis species, conclusions about the dynamics of one toxin group based on results from the other group should be avoided in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18619990     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  14 in total

1.  A mussel tissue certified reference material for multiple phycotoxins. Part 5: profiling by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Elliott J Wright; Pearse McCarron
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  In vitro acylation of okadaic acid in the presence of various bivalves' extracts.

Authors:  Keiichi Konoki; Tatsuya Onoda; Ryuichi Watanabe; Yuko Cho; Shinnosuke Kaga; Toshiyuki Suzuki; Mari Yotsu-Yamashita
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 3.  Dinophysis toxins: causative organisms, distribution and fate in shellfish.

Authors:  Beatriz Reguera; Pilar Riobó; Francisco Rodríguez; Patricio A Díaz; Gemita Pizarro; Beatriz Paz; José M Franco; Juan Blanco
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 5.118

4.  Accumulation and Tissue Distribution of Dinophysitoxin-1 and Dinophysitoxin-3 in the Mussel Crenomytilus grayanus Feeding on the Benthic Dinoflagellate Prorocentrum foraminosum.

Authors:  Polina A Kameneva; Ekaterina A Krasheninina; Valentina V Slobodskova; Sergey P Kukla; Tatiana Yu Orlova
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 5.  Accumulation of Dinophysis Toxins in Bivalve Molluscs.

Authors:  Juan Blanco
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  A Long-Term Time Series of Dinophysis acuminata Blooms and Associated Shellfish Toxin Contamination in Port Underwood, Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand.

Authors:  Lincoln A Mackenzie
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  LC-MS/MS Analysis of the Emerging Toxin Pinnatoxin-G and High Levels of Esterified OA Group Toxins in Galician Commercial Mussels.

Authors:  Paz Otero; Natalia Miguéns; Inés Rodríguez; Luis M Botana
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 8.  Risk assessment of shellfish toxins.

Authors:  Rex Munday; John Reeve
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 9.  Mixtures of Lipophilic Phycotoxins: Exposure Data and Toxicological Assessment.

Authors:  Jimmy Alarcan; Ronel Biré; Ludovic Le Hégarat; Valérie Fessard
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Accumulation and Biotransformation of Dinophysis Toxins by the Surf Clam Mesodesma donacium.

Authors:  Juan Blanco; Gonzalo Álvarez; José Rengel; Rosario Díaz; Carmen Mariño; Helena Martín; Eduardo Uribe
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.