RATIONALE: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) commonly complicates the course of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It has a significant impact on outcomes and is, therefore, important to detect. OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the accuracy and performance characteristics of the right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) as estimated by echocardiography (ECHO) alone and in conjunction with physiologic indices in predicting the presence of PH in IPF patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of IPF patients from two large tertiary centers in whom both ECHO and right-heart catheterization (RHC) were available. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 110 patients with available ECHOs and RHCs. Estimates of RVSP were reported in 60 of these patients (54.5%) of whom 22 (36.6%) had PH, while 16 of the 50 patients without RVSP estimate (32%) had PH. Twenty-four of 60 (40%) ECHOs accurately reflected the pulmonary arterial systolic pressure as measured by RHC. An optimal RVSP threshold for the screening of PH could not be detected. When assessed in combination with various thresholds of PFT and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) parameters, the performance characteristics of the RVSP were slightly improved. CONCLUSION: The RVSP is not an accurate test for the assessment of PH in IPF patients. Awareness of the various combinations of threshold values for RVSP with and without PFT and 6MWT might nonetheless assist clinicians in risk stratifying IPF patients for the presence of PH.
RATIONALE: n class="Disease">Pulmonary hypertension (PH) commonly complicates the course of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It has a significant impact on outcomes and is, therefore, important to detect. OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the accuracy and performance characteristics of the right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) as estimated by echocardiography (ECHO) alone and in conjunction with physiologic indices in predicting the presence of PH in IPFpatients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of IPFpatients from two large tertiary centers in whom both ECHO and right-heart catheterization (RHC) were available. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 110 patients with available ECHOs and RHCs. Estimates of RVSP were reported in 60 of these patients (54.5%) of whom 22 (36.6%) had PH, while 16 of the 50 patients without RVSP estimate (32%) had PH. Twenty-four of 60 (40%) ECHOs accurately reflected the pulmonary arterial systolic pressure as measured by RHC. An optimal RVSP threshold for the screening of PH could not be detected. When assessed in combination with various thresholds of PFT and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) parameters, the performance characteristics of the RVSP were slightly improved. CONCLUSION: The RVSP is not an accurate test for the assessment of PH in IPFpatients. Awareness of the various combinations of threshold values for RVSP with and without PFT and 6MWT might nonetheless assist clinicians in risk stratifying IPFpatients for the presence of PH.
Authors: Selim M Arcasoy; Jason D Christie; Victor A Ferrari; Martin St John Sutton; David A Zisman; Nancy P Blumenthal; Alberto Pochettino; Robert M Kotloff Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-12-12 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: J A Bjoraker; J H Ryu; M K Edwin; J L Myers; H D Tazelaar; D R Schroeder; K P Offord Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Hassan F Nadrous; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael J Krowka; Karen L Swanson; Nithima Chaowalit; Paul A Decker; Jay H Ryu Journal: Chest Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Hanno H Leuchte; Claus Neurohr; Rainer Baumgartner; Michael Holzapfel; Wolfgang Giehrl; Michael Vogeser; Jürgen Behr Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Panagiota I Latsi; Roland M du Bois; Andrew G Nicholson; Thomas V Colby; Danai Bisirtzoglou; Ageliki Nikolakopoulou; Srihari Veeraraghavan; David M Hansell; Athol U Wells Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-06-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ganesh Raghu; Harold R Collard; Jim J Egan; Fernando J Martinez; Juergen Behr; Kevin K Brown; Thomas V Colby; Jean-François Cordier; Kevin R Flaherty; Joseph A Lasky; David A Lynch; Jay H Ryu; Jeffrey J Swigris; Athol U Wells; Julio Ancochea; Demosthenes Bouros; Carlos Carvalho; Ulrich Costabel; Masahito Ebina; David M Hansell; Takeshi Johkoh; Dong Soon Kim; Talmadge E King; Yasuhiro Kondoh; Jeffrey Myers; Nestor L Müller; Andrew G Nicholson; Luca Richeldi; Moisés Selman; Rosalind F Dudden; Barbara S Griss; Shandra L Protzko; Holger J Schünemann Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: D Papakosta; G Pitsiou; Z Daniil; M Dimadi; E Stagaki; A Rapti; K Antoniou; A Tzouvelekis; T Kontakiotis; S Tryfon; V Polychronopoulos; D Bouros Journal: Lung Date: 2011-06-11 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Myriam Amsallem; David Boulate; Zoe Kooreman; Roham T Zamanian; Guillaume Fadel; Ingela Schnittger; Elie Fadel; Michael V McConnell; Gundeep Dhillon; Olaf Mercier; François Haddad Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Belinda N Rivera-Lebron; Paul R Forfia; Maryl Kreider; James C Lee; John H Holmes; Steven M Kawut Journal: Chest Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Laith Alkukhun; Xiao-Feng Wang; Mostafa K Ahmed; Manfred Baumgartner; Marie M Budev; Raed A Dweik; Adriano R Tonelli Journal: Respir Med Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 3.415