Literature DB >> 1861876

Comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain: a follow-up study of treated and non-treated groups.

William W Deardorff1, Howard S Rubin, David W Scott.   

Abstract

There are relatively few outcome studies of multidisciplinary chronic pain programs which have utilized no-treatment comparison groups. The present study compared a group of chronic pain patients (N = 42) treated in a comprehensive multidisciplinary pain program with a group of patients (N = 15) who were evaluated but not treated. Comparisons were made at evaluation and at a follow-up period averaging 11 months later. From evaluation to discharge, the treated group showed significant increases in physical functioning. From evaluation to long-term follow-up, both the treated and non-treated groups showed significant decreases in self-report pain ratings and interference with activities ratings. However, only the treated group showed a significant decrease in addictive medication use and increase in work functioning. The return-to-work rate for the treated group was 48% with an additional 28% of the patients being returned to vocational rehabilitation. None of the non-treated group returned to work or vocational rehabilitation. Results are discussed in terms of their support for the conclusion that comprehensive multidisciplinary pain programs produce marked subjective and functional changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1861876     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90162-Q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  19 in total

1.  [Fear avoidance beliefs in patients with back pain. Psychometric properties of the German version of the FABQ].

Authors:  M Pfingsten
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Workplace changes in successful rehabilitation.

Authors:  K Ekberg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-12

3.  A limited functional restoration program for injured workers: A randomized trial.

Authors:  D T Corey; L E Koepfler; D Etlin; H I Day
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-12

Review 4.  Measuring return to work.

Authors:  Radoslaw Wasiak; Amanda E Young; Richard T Roessler; Kathryn M McPherson; Mireille N M van Poppel; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-10-11

Review 5.  Pharmacoeconomics of chronic nonmalignant pain.

Authors:  M J Zagari; P D Mazonson; W C Longton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Evaluation of multimodal treatment program for fibromyalgia.

Authors:  L W Mason; P Goolkasian; G A McCain
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-04

Review 7.  Philosophy and efficacy of multidisciplinary approach to chronic pain management.

Authors:  Akiko Okifuji; Dennis C Turk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Evaluation of a cognitive behavioural programme for rehabilitating patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  A C Williams; M K Nicholas; P H Richardson; C E Pither; D M Justins; J H Chamberlain; V R Harding; J A Ralphs; S C Jones; I Dieudonné
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  [Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy at the University Pain Centre Dresden].

Authors:  A Schütze; U Kaiser; U Ettrich; K Grosse; G Gossrau; M Schiller; K Pöhlmann; K Brannasch; R Scharnagel; R Sabatowski
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders and Predictors of Pain Management Program Success in Patients With Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Edward A. Workman; John R. Hubbard; Bradford L. Felker
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2002-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.