OBJECTIVE: The effects of the recommended 30:2 compression:ventilation (C:V) ratio on chest compression rate (CR), compression depth (CD), compression pressure (CP) and rescuer fatigue is unknown during pediatric CPR. We hypothesized that a 30:2 C:V ratio will decrease compression depth and compression pressure and increase rescuer fatigue compared with a 15:2 ratio. DESIGN: Randomized crossover observational study. METHODS: Adolescent, child and infant manikins were modified to digitally record compression rate, compression depth, compression pressure and total compression cycles (CC). BLS or PALS certified volunteers were randomized to five CPR groups: adolescent (AD), child 1-hand (OH), child 2-hand (TH), infant two-finger (TF) and infant two-thumb (TT). Each rescuer performed each ratio for 5 min with the order randomized. Rescuer heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) were recorded continuously during CPR and used to determine the recovery time (RT) for HR/RR to return to baseline. Data (mean+/-S.D.) were contrasted by paired differences for quantitative data and the sign rank test for ordinal data. RESULTS:Eighty subjects (16 per group) were randomized. The peak compression pressure and compression rate were not different within any group, but total compression cycle were higher in all 30:2 groups. Compression depth (mm) was not significantly different within any group. The rescuer's HR (bpm) increased significantly during 30:2 CPR in AD and OH group with no significant differences in RR and recovery time. Subjects reported that 15:2 CPR was easier to perform (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: During single rescuer pediatric BLS, more compression cycles were achieved with 30:2 C:V ratio without effect on compression depth, pressure and rate. Increased HR with 30:2 C:V ratio was noted during larger manikin CPR without subjective difference of reported fatigue. Most rescuers in AD and TF group did not achieve recommended compression depth regardless of C:V ratio.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The effects of the recommended 30:2 compression:ventilation (C:V) ratio on chest compression rate (CR), compression depth (CD), compression pressure (CP) and rescuer fatigue is unknown during pediatric CPR. We hypothesized that a 30:2 C:V ratio will decrease compression depth and compression pressure and increase rescuer fatigue compared with a 15:2 ratio. DESIGN: Randomized crossover observational study. METHODS: Adolescent, child and infant manikins were modified to digitally record compression rate, compression depth, compression pressure and total compression cycles (CC). BLS or PALS certified volunteers were randomized to five CPR groups: adolescent (AD), child 1-hand (OH), child 2-hand (TH), infant two-finger (TF) and infant two-thumb (TT). Each rescuer performed each ratio for 5 min with the order randomized. Rescuer heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) were recorded continuously during CPR and used to determine the recovery time (RT) for HR/RR to return to baseline. Data (mean+/-S.D.) were contrasted by paired differences for quantitative data and the sign rank test for ordinal data. RESULTS: Eighty subjects (16 per group) were randomized. The peak compression pressure and compression rate were not different within any group, but total compression cycle were higher in all 30:2 groups. Compression depth (mm) was not significantly different within any group. The rescuer's HR (bpm) increased significantly during 30:2 CPR in AD and OH group with no significant differences in RR and recovery time. Subjects reported that 15:2 CPR was easier to perform (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: During single rescuer pediatric BLS, more compression cycles were achieved with 30:2 C:V ratio without effect on compression depth, pressure and rate. Increased HR with 30:2 C:V ratio was noted during larger manikin CPR without subjective difference of reported fatigue. Most rescuers in AD and TF group did not achieve recommended compression depth regardless of C:V ratio.
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Marc D Berg; Stephen M Schexnayder; Leon Chameides; Mark Terry; Aaron Donoghue; Robert W Hickey; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Mary Fran Hazinski Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marc D Berg; Stephen M Schexnayder; Leon Chameides; Mark Terry; Aaron Donoghue; Robert W Hickey; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Mary Fran Hazinski Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Young Sinn Kim; Je Hyeok Oh; Chan Woong Kim; Sung Eun Kim; Dong Hoon Lee; Jun Young Hong Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Chun-Yu Chang; Po-Chen Lin; Yung-Jiun Chien; Chien-Sheng Chen; Meng-Yu Wu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 3.390