Literature DB >> 18617071

Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome: plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score.

Maureen M Henneman1, Joanne D Schuijf, Gabija Pundziute, Jacob M van Werkhoven, Ernst E van der Wall, J Wouter Jukema, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the atherosclerotic plaque burden and morphology as determined by 64-slice multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography in relation to the calcium score in patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
BACKGROUND: The absence of coronary calcium during coronary calcium scoring has been proposed to rule out significant coronary artery disease (CAD). However, data in patients presenting with suspected ACS are scarce.
METHODS: In 40 patients (age 57 +/- 11 years, 26 men) presenting with suspected ACS, MSCT coronary angiography in combination with coronary calcium scoring was performed before conventional coronary angiography. MSCT angiograms were evaluated for the presence or absence of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and the presence or absence of obstructive (> or =50% luminal narrowing) CAD. In addition, plaque type was determined, and findings were related to the calcium score.
RESULTS: Coronary artery disease was observed in 38 patients, of whom 10 patients had nonobstructive and 28 patients had obstructive CAD, confirmed by conventional coronary angiography in all patients. In patients with CAD, plaques were distributed as follows: 39% noncalcified plaques, 47% mixed plaques, and 14% calcified plaques. Coronary calcium was detected in 27 patients, of whom 10 had a score >400. In 13 (33%) patients, no coronary calcium was observed, but in 11 (85%), atherosclerotic plaques were detected on MSCT angiography.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with suspected ACS, noncalcified plaques are highly prevalent and the absence of coronary calcium does not reliably exclude the presence of (significant) atherosclerosis. This information may be of value to improve our understanding of the potential role of MSCT in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18617071     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  60 in total

1.  Coronary artery calcification and vascular function.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Emergency department assessment of acute-onset chest pain: contemporary approaches and their consequences.

Authors:  Thomas C Gerber; Michael C Kontos; Birgit Kantor
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Ilan Gottlieb; Julie M Miller; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Marc Dewey; Melvin E Clouse; Leonardo Sara; Hiroyuki Niinuma; David E Bush; Narinder Paul; Andrea L Vavere; John Texter; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima; Carlos E Rochitte
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Atherosclerotic plaque imaging by PET/CT; can inactive, active and mixed plaques be discerned?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J W Jukema; J J Bax; A van der Laarse
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Rabbit models: ideal for imaging purposes?

Authors:  A van der Laarse; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Aortic and coronary atherosclerosis: a natural association?

Authors:  Ernst E van der Wall; Arnoud van der Laarse
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Monitoring plaque composition: is it worthwile?

Authors:  Arnoud van der Laarse; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Dual source computed tomography: automated, visual or dual analysis?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Non-significant left main disease; truly non-significant?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J W Jukema; J J Bax; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Integrated imaging of cardiac anatomy, physiology, and viability.

Authors:  James A Arrighi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.