Literature DB >> 18616744

Understanding trait-dependent community disassembly: dung beetles, density functions, and forest fragmentation.

Trond H Larsen1, Alejandro Lopera, Adrian Forsyth.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic disturbances such as fragmentation are rapidly altering biodiversity, yet a lack of attention to species traits and abundance patterns has made the results of most studies difficult to generalize. We determined traits of extinction-prone species and present a novel strategy for classifying species according to their population-level response to a gradient of disturbance intensity. We examined the effects of forest fragmentation on dung beetle communities in an archipelago of 33 islands recently created by flooding in Venezuela. Species richness, density, and biomass all declined sharply with decreasing island area and increasing island isolation. Species richness was highly nested, indicating that local extinctions occurred nonrandomly. The most sensitive dung beetle species appeared to require at least 85 ha of forest, more than many large vertebrates. Extinction-prone species were either large-bodied, forest specialists, or uncommon. These explanatory variables were unrelated, suggesting at least 3 underlying causes of extirpation. Large species showed high wing loading (body mass/wing area) and a distinct flight strategy that may increase their area requirements. Although forest specificity made most species sensitive to fragmentation, a few persistent habitat generalists dispersed across the matrix. Density functions classified species into 4 response groups on the basis of their change in density with decreasing species richness. Sensitive and persistent species both declined with increasing fragmentation intensity, but persistent species occurred on more islands, which may be due to their higher baseline densities. Compensatory species increased in abundance following the initial loss of sensitive species, but rapidly declined with increasing fragmentation. Supertramp species (widespread habitat generalists) may be poor competitors but strong dispersers; their abundance peaked following the decline of the other 3 groups. Nevertheless, even the least sensitive species were extirpated or rare on the smallest and most isolated islands.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18616744     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00969.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  11 in total

1.  Influence of Urban Landscape on Ants and Spiders Richness and Composition in Forests.

Authors:  T S Melo; E F Moreira; M V A Lopes; A R S Andrade; A D Brescovit; M C L Peres; J H C Delabie
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 1.434

2.  Differential responses and mechanisms of productivity following experimental species loss scenarios.

Authors:  Takehiro Sasaki; Yu Yoshihara; Masaya Takahashi; Lkhagvasuren Byambatsetseg; Risa Futahashi; Dashzeveg Nyambayar; Yoshihisa Suyama
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Negative impacts of human land use on dung beetle functional diversity.

Authors:  Felipe Barragán; Claudia E Moreno; Federico Escobar; Gonzalo Halffter; Dario Navarrete
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How habitat change and rainfall affect dung beetle diversity in Caatinga, a Brazilian semi-arid ecosystem.

Authors:  Carolina Nunes Liberal; Ângela Maria Isidro de Farias; Marcos Vinicius Meiado; Bruno K C Filgueiras; Luciana Iannuzzi
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.857

5.  Scale-dependence of processes structuring dung beetle metacommunities using functional diversity and community deconstruction approaches.

Authors:  Pedro Giovâni da Silva; Malva Isabel Medina Hernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Does logging and forest conversion to oil palm agriculture alter functional diversity in a biodiversity hotspot?

Authors:  F A Edwards; D P Edwards; T H Larsen; W W Hsu; S Benedick; A Chung; C Vun Khen; D S Wilcove; K C Hamer
Journal:  Anim Conserv       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Spatial patterns of movement of dung beetle species in a tropical forest suggest a new trap spacing for dung beetle biodiversity studies.

Authors:  Pedro Giovâni da Silva; Malva Isabel Medina Hernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The role of species traits in mediating functional recovery during matrix restoration.

Authors:  Andrew D Barnes; Rowan M Emberson; Frank-Thorsten Krell; Raphael K Didham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Biodiversity thresholds in invertebrate communities: The responses of dung beetle subgroups to forest loss.

Authors:  Clarissa Machado Pinto Leite; Eduardo Mariano-Neto; Pedro Luís Bernardo da Rocha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assemblage and functional categorization of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) from the Pantanal.

Authors:  Marcelo B Pessôa; Thiago J Izzo; Fernando Z Vaz-de-Mello
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.