Literature DB >> 18616276

ELISA for sulfonamides and its application for screening in water contamination.

Weilin L Shelver1, Nancy W Shappell, Milan Franek, Fernando R Rubio.   

Abstract

Two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were tested for their suitability for detecting sulfonamides in wastewater from various stages in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), the river into which the wastewater is discharged, and two swine-rearing facilities. The sulfamethoxazole ELISA cross-reacts with several compounds, achieving detection limits of <0.04 microg/L for sulfamethoxazole (SMX), sulfamethoxypyridine, sulfachloropyridine, and sulfamethoxine, whereas the sulfamethazine (SMZ) ELISA is more compound specific, with a detection limit of <0.03 microg/L. Samples from various stages of wastewater purifications gave 0.6-3.1 microg/L by SMX-ELISA, whereas river samples were approximately 10-fold lower, ranging from below detection to 0.09 microg/L. Swine wastewater samples analyzed by the SMX-ELISA were either at or near detectable limits from one facility, whereas the other facility had concentrations of approximately 0.5 microg/L, although LC-MS/MS did not confirm the presence of SMX. Sulfamethazine ELISA detected no SMZ in either WWTP or river samples. In contrast, wastewater samples from swine facilities analyzed by SMZ-ELISA were found to contain approximately 30 microg/L [piglet (50-100 lb) wastewater] and approximately 7 microg/L (market-weight hog wastewater). Sulfamethazine ELISA analyses of wastewater from another swine facility found concentrations to be near or below detection limits. A solid phase extraction method was used to isolate and concentrate sulfonamides from water samples prior to LC-MS/MS multiresidue confirmatory analysis. The recoveries at 1 microg/L fortification ranged from 42 +/- 4% for SMZ to 88 +/- 4% for SMX ( n = 6). The ELISA results in the WWTPs were confirmed by LC-MS/MS, as sulfonamide multiresidue confirmatory analysis identified SMX, sulfapyridine, and sulfasalazine to be present in the wastewater. Sulfamethazine presence at one swine-rearing facility was also confirmed by LC-MS/MS, demonstrating the usefulness of the ELISA technique as a rapid and high-throughput screening method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18616276     DOI: 10.1021/jf800657u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  5 in total

1.  Electrocatalytic response of poly(cobalt tetraaminophthalocyanine)/multi-walled carbon nanotubes-Nafion modified electrode toward sulfadiazine in urine.

Authors:  Xiao-ping Hong; Yan Zhu; Yan-zhen Zhang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Adsorption of pharmaceuticals from biologically treated municipal wastewater using paper mill sludge-based activated carbon.

Authors:  Carla Patrícia Silva; Guilaine Jaria; Marta Otero; Valdemar I Esteves; Vânia Calisto
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Selection of anti-sulfadimidine specific ScFvs from a hybridoma cell by eukaryotic ribosome display.

Authors:  Yonghua Qi; Congming Wu; Suxia Zhang; Zhanhui Wang; Siyang Huang; Lei Dai; Shaochen Wang; Lining Xia; Kai Wen; Xingyuan Cao; Yongning Wu; Jianzhong Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Investigating the removal of some pharmaceutical compounds in hospital wastewater treatment plants operating in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Hamed Al Qarni; Philip Collier; Juliette O'Keeffe; Joseph Akunna
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Detection of Pharmaceutical Residues in Surface Waters of the Eastern Cape Province.

Authors:  Sesethu Vumazonke; Sandile Maswazi Khamanga; Nosiphiwe Patience Ngqwala
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.