Literature DB >> 18616077

Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered screw-vent implants: results after up to eight years of clinical function.

Zeev Ormianer1, Ady Palti.   

Abstract

Uncertainty about the causes of peri-implant bone loss and difficulties in measuring it often have resulted in omission of bone loss data from published long-term implant studies. This nonrandomized, uncontrolled, retrospective study evaluated the clinical outcomes of treatment with tapered, multithreaded implants with a special emphasis on peri-implant crestal bone status. Chart reviews were conducted of 60 patients who had been treated with 267 implants for the placement of 1 or more missing and/or unsalvageable teeth, and who met general inclusion criteria for dental implant therapy. In all cases, marginal bone changes were calculated from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) or the implant neck to the crestal bone level with standardized radiographs taken at implant placement (baseline) and during annual follow-up. After a mean followup of 7.5 years, implant survival was 98.5% (263/267) for all implants placed, and implant success was 96.2% (253/263) for all surviving implants. No discernible bone loss was evident in 88% of surviving implants. Crestal bone loss was observed in 25% (15/60) of total study subjects and in 12% (32/263) of all surviving implants: 29 implants exhibited 1 mm of bone loss and 3 implants lost 2 mm of bone. Low-density maxillary jawbone and more extensive bone remodeling, which were required around implants immediately placed into extraction sockets, were the probable causes of observed bone loss in this study. Implants exhibited excellent long-term outcomes with little or no bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18616077     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2008)34[150:RCEOTS]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  4 in total

1.  Postextraction implant placement with immediate provisionalisation and finalisation, using a simplified technique: technical notes and a case report.

Authors:  Rudy Scala; Paolo Ghensi; Alessandro Cucchi; Enrico Pistoia
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2012-10-05

2.  A retrospective study on a series of 556 zimmer dental implants.

Authors:  Carlo Maria Soardi; Ezio Zandanel; Elena Rebuffini; Rebuffini Carinci
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-12

Review 3.  Dental Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction Sockets versus Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Ibrahim; Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  A 3-year prospective randomized clinical trial of alveolar bone crest response and clinical parameters through 1, 2, and 3 years of clinical function of implants placed 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation using two different allogeneic bone-grafting materials.

Authors:  Önder Solakoğlu; Duygu Ofluoğlu; Heidi Schwarzenbach; Guido Heydecke; Daniel Reißmann; Sertan Ergun; Werner Götz
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-02-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.