Literature DB >> 18615293

Do fears of malpractice litigation influence teaching behaviors?

Darcy A Reed1, Donna M Windish, Rachel B Levine, Steven J Kravet, Leah Wolfe, Scott M Wright.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical malpractice is prominently positioned in the consciousness of American physicians, and the perceived threat of malpractice litigation may push physicians to practice defensively and alter their teaching behaviors.
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to characterize the attitudes of academic medical faculty toward malpractice litigation and to identify teaching behaviors associated with fear of malpractice litigation.
METHODS: We surveyed 270 full-time clinically active physicians in the Department of Medicine at a large academic medical center. The survey assessed physicians' attitudes toward malpractice issues, fear of malpractice litigation, and self-reported teaching behaviors associated with concerns about litigation.
RESULTS: Two hundred and fifteen physicians responded (80%). Faculty scored an average of 25.5 +/- 6.9 (range = 6-42, higher scores indicate greater fear) on a reliable malpractice fear scale. Younger age (Spearman's rho = 0.19, p = .02) and greater time spent in clinical activities (rho = 0.26, p < .001) were correlated with higher scores on the Malpractice Fear Scale. Faculty reported that because of the perceived prevalence of lawsuits and claims made against physicians, they spend more time writing clinical notes for patients seen by learners (74%), give learners less autonomy in patient care (44%), and limit opportunities for learners to perform clinical procedures (32%) and deliver bad news to patients (33%). Faculty with higher levels of fear on the Malpractice Fear Scale were more likely to report changing their teaching behaviors because of this perceived threat (rho = 0.38, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians report changes in teaching behaviors because of concerns about malpractice litigation. Although concerns about malpractice may promote increased supervision and positive role modeling, they may also limit important educational opportunities for learners. These results may serve to heighten awareness to the fact that teaching behaviors and decisions may be influenced by the malpractice climate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18615293     DOI: 10.1080/10401330802199443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  7 in total

1.  Malpractice Claim Fears and the Costs of Treating Medicare Patients: A New Approach to Estimating the Costs of Defensive Medicine.

Authors:  James D Reschovsky; Cynthia B Saiontz-Martinez
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Medical internship training in Saudi Arabia: interns' views and perceptions.

Authors:  Ali I Swaid; Abdelkhalig H Elhilu; Mohamed S Mahfouz
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2017-01-31

3.  Triggers of defensive medical behaviours: a cross-sectional study among physicians in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Erik Renkema; Kees Ahaus; Manda Broekhuis; Maria Tims
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The Personal and Professional Impact of Patients' Complaints on Doctors-A Qualitative Approach.

Authors:  Bianca Hanganu; Beatrice Gabriela Ioan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Why Are Patients Unhappy with Their Healthcare? A Romanian Physicians' Perspective.

Authors:  Bianca Hanganu; Irina Smaranda Manoilescu; Cristian Paparau; Laura Gheuca-Solovastru; Camelia Liana Buhas; Andreea Silvana Szalontay; Beatrice Gabriela Ioan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Defensive medicine in Israel - a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Elad Asher; Sari Greenberg-Dotan; Jonathan Halevy; Shimon Glick; Haim Reuveni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nathalie Baungaard; Pia Ladeby Skovvang; Elisabeth Assing Hvidt; Helle Gerbild; Merethe Kirstine Andersen; Jesper Lykkegaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.