Literature DB >> 18614149

Radiofrequency energy delivery to the anal canal: is it a promising new approach to the treatment of fecal incontinence?

Duck-Woo Kim1, Hong-Man Yoon, Jun-Seok Park, Young Hoon Kim, Sung-Bum Kang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the delivery of radiofrequency energy to the anal canal (the SECCA procedure).
METHODS: Eight patients with fecal incontinence underwent the SECCA procedure. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score and the Fecal Incontinence-related Quality of Life (FIQL) scale were completed at baseline and after the procedure. Anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound also were conducted.
RESULTS: Seven of the 8 patients were women, and the median age of the patients was 59 years (range, 28-73 y). The mean FISI score and all of the parameters in the FIQL scale with the exception of the embarrassment scale measured at 6 months after the procedure was not improved significantly. We observed no changes in the anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound parameters. Complications associated with the procedure developed in 7 of the 8 patients, including anal bleeding, anal pain, and anal mucosal discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The FISI score and FIQL scale were not improved significantly after the SECCA procedure, and considerable complications were associated with the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18614149     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Update on the Management of Fecal Incontinence for the Gastroenterologist.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-03

Review 3.  Faecal incontinence: Current knowledges and perspectives.

Authors:  Alban Benezech; Michel Bouvier; Véronique Vitton
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 4.  Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Clinical response and sustainability of treatment with temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (Secca) in patients with faecal incontinence: 3 years follow-up.

Authors:  T J Lam; A P Visscher; M M Meurs-Szojda; R J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Diagnosis and Management of Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-03-26

Review 7.  Surgical Treatment Alternatives to Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence: Injectables, Sphincter Repair, and Colostomy.

Authors:  Srinivas Joga Ivatury; Lauren R Wilson; Ian M Paquette
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-01-28

8.  Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence.

Authors:  Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori; Mario Pescatori
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-03-04

9.  Temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy in patients with anal incontinence: an interim analysis of worldwide data.

Authors:  Richelle J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-04-12

Review 10.  Critical appraisal of international guidelines for the management of fecal incontinence in adults: is it possible to define what to do in different clinical scenarios?

Authors:  A Muñoz-Duyos; L Lagares-Tena; Y Ribas; J C Baanante; A Navarro-Luna
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.781

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.