Literature DB >> 18614139

Relationship between emergency presentation, systemic inflammatory response, and cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colon cancer.

Joseph E M Crozier1, E Fiona Leitch, Ruth F McKee, John H Anderson, Paul G Horgan, Donald C McMillan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency presentation is recognized to be associated with poorer cancer-specific survival following curative resection for colorectal cancer. The present study examined the hypothesis that an enhanced systemic inflammatory response, prior to surgery, might explain the impact of emergency presentation on survival.
METHODS: In all, 188 patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer were studied. Of these, 55 (29%) presented as emergencies. The systemic inflammatory response was assessed using the Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), which is the combination of an elevated C-reactive protein (>10 mg/L) and hypoalbuminemia (<35 g/L).
RESULTS: In the emergency group, tumor stage was greater (P < 0.01), more patients received adjuvant therapy (P < 0.01) more patients had an elevated mGPS (P < 0.01), and more patients died of their disease (P < 0.05). The minimum follow-up was 12 months; the median follow-up of the survivors was 48 months. Emergency presentation was associated with poorer 3-year cancer-specific survival in those patients aged 65 to 74 years (P < 0.01), in both males and females (P < 0.05), in the deprived (P < 0.01), in patients with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage II disease (P < 0.01), in those who received no adjuvant therapy (P < 0.01), and in the mGPS 0 and 1 groups (P < 0.05) groups. On multivariate survival analysis of patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for TNM stage II colon cancer, emergency presentation (P < 0.05) and mGPS (P < 0.05) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that emergency presentation and the presence of systemic inflammatory response prior to surgery are linked and account for poorer cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colon cancer. Both emergency presentation and an elevated mGPS should be taken into account when assessing the likely outcome of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18614139     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  24 in total

1.  Emergent Colectomy Is Independently Associated with Decreased Long-Term Overall Survival in Colon Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Zhaomin Xu; Adan Z Becerra; Christopher T Aquina; Bradley J Hensley; Carla F Justiniano; Courtney Boodry; Alex A Swanger; Reza Arsalanizadeh; Katia Noyes; John R Monson; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Colorectal carcinoma masked by systemic inflammatory response syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Hongyun Wei; Waqas Choudhary; Rong He; Chunhui Ouyang; Zongyong Cheng; Deliang Liu; Fanggen Lu; Xiaowei Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Usefulness of an inflammation-based prognostic score (mGPS) for predicting survival in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Yoshimi Iwasaki; Mitsuru Ishizuka; Masato Kato; Junji Kita; Mitsugi Shimoda; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Resection of TNM Stage I Colorectal Cancer: An Analysis of Tumour and Host Determinants of Outcome.

Authors:  David Mansouri; Arfon G Powell; James H Park; Donald C McMillan; Paul G Horgan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The modified Glasgow prognostic score for early mortality in patients with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tomohiro Adachi; Takao Hinoi; Minoru Hattori; Hiroyuki Egi; Manabu Shimomura; Yasufumi Saito; Hiroyuki Sawada; Masashi Miguchi; Hiroaki Niitsu; Shoichiro Mukai; Takuya Yano; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Low preoperative serum albumin in colon cancer: a risk factor for poor outcome.

Authors:  Cheng-Chou Lai; Jeng-Fu You; Chien-Yuh Yeh; Jinn-Shiun Chen; Reiping Tang; Jeng-Yi Wang; Chih-Chien Chin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Does the outcome of colonic flexure cancers differ from the other colonic sites?

Authors:  Irshad A Shaikh; Stuart A Suttie; Mary Urquhart; Amin I Amin; Thomas Daniel; Satheesh Yalamarthi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Splenic flexure colon cancers: minimally invasive treatment.

Authors:  Valentino Fiscon; Giuseppe Portale; Giovanni Migliorini; Flavio Frigo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-02-22

9.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer: comparison of the prognostic value of tumour and patient related factors.

Authors:  Campbell Roxburgh; Alec McDonald; Jonathan Salmond; Karin Oien; John Anderson; Ruth McKee; Paul Horgan; Donald McMillan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Emergency presentation of node-negative colorectal cancer treated with curative surgery is associated with poorer short and longer-term survival.

Authors:  Raymond Oliphant; David Mansouri; Gary A Nicholson; Donald C McMillan; Paul G Horgan; David S Morrison
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.