Literature DB >> 18613404

Prognostic value of the monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX)-test prior to liver resection.

T Lorf1, A A Schnitzbauer, S K H Schaefers, M N Scherer, H J Schlitt, M Oellerich, H Becker, A Obed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The critical issue before major hepatic resection is to evaluate and detect patients with a potentially increased risk of hepatic failure. In this study the prognostic value of the monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX)- liver function test was evaluated with regards to clinical course and survival after partial liver resection.
METHODOLOGY: Between 1995 and 2000 a total of 55 patients (29 male, 26 female) underwent a partial liver resection at the Georg-August University of Göttingen. Forty-two patients were treated for malignant, and 13 for benign, disease. MEGX-testing was performed 15 and 30 minutes after a single-dose of 1mg/kg BW Lidocaine i.v. was applied.
RESULTS: MEGX-test results after 30 minutes had significant influence on hospital mortality. Patients who died during the hospital stay showed median MEGX-30 minutes results of 32 microg/L in (4-107 microg/L) in comparison to the surviving patients with a median 68 microg/L (16-176 microg/L) (p = 0.026). Furthermore, patients with MEGX scaled categories of 3 and 4 had a significantly lower surivial at 150 days (p = 0.008) and overall (p = 0.0002). There was an indirect impact of MEGX on hospital stay, costs and mortality reflecting high fluid loss: patients with lower loss of fluid over drainages had a significantly lower mortality at 150 days (p = 0.00046) and overall (p = 0.00008), than did patients with higher fluid loss. Low MEGX-values significantly influenced long hospital stay (p = 0.00001) and high costs (p = 0.00001). Pathologic MEGX in combination with increased age, increased BMI and extensive surgical procedures including resection of over 50% volume of the liver had a significant influence on complications (p = 0.015).
CONCLUSION: The preoperative MEGX-test, especially the 30 minutes value, is a useful medium to estimate the liver reserve in non-cirrhotic patients prior to liver resection. In combination with the resection volume it may be very useful to identify patients with a high risk of developing a postoperative liver failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18613404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  5 in total

1.  Sources of Interindividual Variability.

Authors:  Yvonne S Lin; Kenneth E Thummel; Brice D Thompson; Rheem A Totah; Christi W Cho
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Hepatic function assessment to predict post-hepatectomy liver failure: what can we trust? A systematic review.

Authors:  Federico Tomassini; Mariano C Giglio; Giuseppe De Simone; Roberto Montalti; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-08-04

3.  Liver-to-spleen ratio as an index of chronic liver diseases and safety of hepatectomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yangqing Huang; Bin Huang; Tong Kan; Boshuai Yang; Min Yuan; Jiefei Wang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Chemotherapy-associated liver injury in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stuart M Robinson; Colin H Wilson; Alastair D Burt; Derek M Manas; Steven A White
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Regional citrate anticoagulation in patients with liver failure--time for a rethink?

Authors:  Sameer Patel; Julia Wendon
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.