Literature DB >> 18613308

Quantification of damage to suspended insect cells as a result of bubble rupture.

K Trinh1, M Garcia-Briones, J J Chalmers, F Hink.   

Abstract

It is proposed that when cells are either attached to, or very near, a rupturing bubble, the hydrodynamic forces associated with the rupture are sufficient to kill the cells. Four types of experiments were conducted to quantify the number and location of these killed cells. We determined: (1) the number of cells killed as a result of a single, 3.5-mm bubble rupture; (2) the number and viability of cells in the upward jet that results when a bubble ruptures; (3) the number of cells on the bubble film; and (4) the fate of cells attached to the bubble film after film rupture. All experiments were conducted with Spodoptera frugiperda (SF-9) insect cells, in TNM-FH and SFML medium, with and without Pluronic F-68. Experiments indicate that approximately 1050 cells are killed per single, 3.5-mm bubble rupture in TNM-FH medium and approximately the same number of dead cells are present in the upward jet. It was also observed that the concentration of cells in this upward jet is higher than the cell suspension in TNM-FH medium without Pluronic F-68 by a factor of two. It is believed that this higher concentration is the result of cells adhering to the bubble interface. These cells are swept up into the upward jet during the bubble rupture process. Finally, it is suggested that a thin layer around the bubble containing these absorbed cells is the "hypothetical killing volume" presented by other researchers. (c) 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 18613308     DOI: 10.1002/bit.260430106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  11 in total

1.  Death rate in a small air-lift loop reactor of vero cells grown on solid microcarriers and in macroporous microcarriers.

Authors:  D E Martens; E A Nollen; M Hardeveld; C A Velden-de Groot; C D Gooijer; E C Beuvery; J Tramper
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Shear sensitivity of insect cells.

Authors:  J J Chalmers
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Death rate in a small air-lift loop reactor of vero cells grown on solid microcarriers and in macroporous microcarriers.

Authors:  D E Martens; E A Nollen; M Hardeveld; C A van der Velden-de Groot; C D de Gooijer; E C Beuvery; J Tramper
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Scale up aspects of sparged insect-cell bioreactors.

Authors:  J Tramper; J M Vlak; C D de Gooijer
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Pluronic enhances the robustness and reduces the cell attachment of mammalian cells.

Authors:  T Tharmalingam; H Ghebeh; T Wuerz; M Butler
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Reactor design for large scale suspension animal cell culture.

Authors:  J Varley; J Birch
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  The potential of hydrodynamic damage to animal cells of industrial relevance: current understanding.

Authors:  Weiwei Hu; Claudia Berdugo; Jeffrey J Chalmers
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  Quantitative investigations of cell-bubble interactions using a foam fractionation technique.

Authors:  W S Tan; G C Dai; Y L Chen
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 9.  Cells and bubbles in sparged bioreactors.

Authors:  J J Chalmers
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.058

10.  Quantifying the potential for bursting bubbles to damage suspended cells.

Authors:  Peter L L Walls; Oliver McRae; Venkatesh Natarajan; Chris Johnson; Chris Antoniou; James C Bird
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.