Literature DB >> 1861301

Bladder augmentation in patients with neurogenic bladder and vesicoureteral reflux.

P F Nasrallah1, H A Aliabadi.   

Abstract

Current treatment of noncompliant neurogenic bladder associated with significant vesicoureteral reflux that is refractory to intermittent self-catheterization and anticholinergic therapy includes bladder augmentation coupled with a procedure to eliminate reflux. Antireflux surgery is often difficult in such a clinical setting. The diseased and thickened detrusor makes reimplantation into the bladder difficult, and successful reimplantation into the intestinal component is tricky and time-consuming. Augmentation alone was done in 14 patients with significant vesicoureteral reflux in the face of a noncompliant, high pressure neurogenic bladder. No effort was made to correct reflux surgically because, in theory, reflux is secondary to abnormal bladder pressure. Of the 13 patients who have had adequate evaluation with postoperative cystograms 12 no longer have reflux. The reflux in the remaining patient has improved from grade IV to grade II. Postoperative cystometric examination in 12 patients demonstrated low pressure and adequate volume. Correction of bladder dynamics alone reversed the reflux. Conversely, persistence of reflux postoperatively is an indication that augmentation has not successfully returned the bladder to a low pressure reservoir. Our experience indicates that antireflux procedures are not routinely needed in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1861301     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37855-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  The use of refluxing ureter in the creation of a Mitrofanoff channel in children undergoing bladder augmentation: is a formal reimplantation necessary?

Authors:  Parag Tapre; Sudipta Sen; Jacob Chacko; Sampath Karl
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Experiences with clam ileocystoplasty.

Authors:  O Kayigil; O Atahan; A Metin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Spinal dysraphism: a neurosurgical review for the urologist.

Authors:  José Murillo B Netto; André N Bastos; André A Figueiredo; Luis M Pérez
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Management of vesicoureteral reflux in neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Charlotte Q Wu; Israel Franco
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-06-02

5.  Ureteral reimplantation during augmentation cystoplasty is not needed for vesicoureteral reflux in patients with neurogenic bladder: a long-term retrospective study.

Authors:  Hiroki Chiba; Takeya Kitta; Madoka Higuchi; Naohisa Kusakabe; Masafumi Kon; Michiko Nakamura; Nobuo Shinohara
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.