Literature DB >> 18612266

Negative words on surgical wards result in therapeutic failure of patient-controlled analgesia and further release of cortisol after abdominal surgeries.

F Wang1, X Shen, S Xu, Y Liu, L Ma, Q Zhao, D Fu, Q Pan, S Feng, X Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The perception of pain is germane to the environmental stimuli. Nurses on surgical wards are the main contributor in influencing patients' psychophysiological fettle. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of different words, negative or positive, from nurses on postoperative pain therapy with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
METHODS: 1500 ASA I-II patients, who underwent abdominal hysterectomy, were screened and 771 were randomized into one of four groups. In the no words group (NW, N.=35), no words was delivered. The positive (PW, N.=248), partially negative (NW1, N.=241) and totally negative (NW2, N.=247) groups received corresponding words when treating with morphine PCA, the words were given singly at the 3(rd), 6(th), 12(th), 18(th) h and repeatedly at the 3(rd) and 6(th) h, and each group was redivided into six subgroups according to varying time points. Pain intensity, morphine consumption, side effects, overall sedation and satisfaction scores were recorded and plasma cortisol was tested.
RESULTS: A total of 614 patients completed the study. Negative words expressed significant influence on pain therapy at the 3(rd) and 6(th) h after surgeries (P<0.01), and this effect was more convenient in repeatedly treated patients (P<0.001). Positive and the 12(th) and 18(th) h negative words displayed little role in pain management. Morphine consumption, side effects, satisfaction and cortisol level converted with the change of the pain intensity. No intergroup differences were observed in patients' overall conditions.
CONCLUSION: Negative words on surgical wards influenced postoperative pain management at the earlier period of time after abdominal surgeries associated with the HPA axis activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18612266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  6 in total

1.  Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy Howick; Andrew Moscrop; Alexander Mebius; Thomas R Fanshawe; George Lewith; Felicity L Bishop; Patriek Mistiaen; Nia W Roberts; Eglė Dieninytė; Xiao-Yang Hu; Paul Aveyard; Igho J Onakpoya
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Hypnosis in the Perioperative Management of Breast Cancer Surgery: Clinical Benefits and Potential Implications.

Authors:  Arnaud Potié; Fabienne Roelants; Audrey Pospiech; Mona Momeni; Christine Watremez
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-08-21

3.  Commentary: The Effect of Words on Health and Diabetes.

Authors:  Jane K Dickinson
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2017-02

4.  The Experience of Diabetes-Related Language in Diabetes Care.

Authors:  Jane K Dickinson
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2018-02

5.  How words impact on pain.

Authors:  Alexander Ritter; Marcel Franz; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Fear of pain potentiates nocebo hyperalgesia.

Authors:  Per M Aslaksen; Peter S Lyby
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.