Literature DB >> 18612149

Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life.

Jennifer F Waljee1, Emily S Hu, Peter A Ubel, Dylan M Smith, Lisa A Newman, Amy K Alderman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is often assumed to result in minimal deformity, many patients report postoperative breast asymmetry. Understanding the effect of asymmetry on psychosocial functioning is essential for patients to make an informed choice for surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All women who underwent BCS at the University of Michigan Medical Center (Ann Arbor, MI) during a 4-year period were surveyed using a mailed questionnaire (N = 714; response rate = 79.5%). Women were queried regarding five aspects of psychosocial functioning: quality of life (QOL), depression, fear of recurrence, stigmatization, and perceived change in health status. Postoperative breast asymmetry was assessed using items from the Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes Survey. Multiple regression was used to examine the relationship between breast asymmetry and each outcome, controlling for age, time from surgery in years, race, education level, disease stage, surgical treatment, and the occurrence of postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Women with pronounced breast asymmetry were significantly more likely to feel stigmatized as a result of their breast cancer treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 4.58; 95% CI, 2.77 to 7.55) and less likely to report unchanged or improved health after treatment (OR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66). Minimal breast asymmetry was associated with higher QOL scores (86.3 v 82.4, P < .001). Finally, women with pronounced breast asymmetry were more likely to exhibit depressive symptoms (minimal asymmetry, 16.2%; moderate asymmetry, 18.0%; pronounced asymmetry, 33.7%, Wald test = 16.6; P = .002).
CONCLUSION: Pronounced breast asymmetry after BCS is significantly correlated with poor psychosocial functioning. Identifying patients at risk for postoperative asymmetry at the time of consultation may allow for improved referral for supportive counseling, prosthetics, and reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18612149     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  64 in total

1.  Factors that Affect Patients' Decision-Making about Mastectomy or Breast Conserving Surgery, and the Psychological Effect of this Choice on Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mahmut Gumus; Basak O Ustaalioglu; Meral Garip; Emre Kiziltan; Ahmet Bilici; Mesut Seker; Burcak Erkol; Taflan Salepci; Alpaslan Mayadagli; Nazim S Turhal
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2. 

Authors:  Ron B Somogyi; Natalia Ziolkowski; Fahima Osman; Alexandra Ginty; Mitchell Brown
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Does Quality of Life Among Modified Radical Mastectomy and Breast Conservation Surgery Patients Differ? A 5-Year Comparative Study.

Authors:  Vivek Bhat; A P Roshini; Rakesh Ramesh
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-13

Review 4.  Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Sébastien Simard; Belinda Thewes; Gerry Humphris; Mélanie Dixon; Ceara Hayden; Shab Mireskandari; Gozde Ozakinci
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Therapy choices and quality of life in young breast cancer survivors: a short-term follow-up.

Authors:  Marie Catherine Lee; Rajendra S Bhati; Edina E von Rottenthaler; Angela M Reagan; Sloan B Karver; Richard R Reich; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Depression Induced by Total Mastectomy, Breast Conserving Surgery and Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chengjiao Zhang; Guangfu Hu; Ewelina Biskup; Xiaochun Qiu; Hongwei Zhang; Haiyin Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of oxidized regenerated cellulose in breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Michela Giuliani; Rossella Rella; Rita Fubelli; Federica Patrolecco; Silvia Eleonora Di Giovanni; Chiara Buccheri; Federico Padovano; Paolo Belli; Maurizio Romani; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Enida Bufi; Gianluca Franceschini; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Intraoperative ultrasound guided breast surgery: paving the way for personalized surgery.

Authors:  Martin Espinosa-Bravo; Isabel T Rubio
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-06

9.  Comparison of quality of life, satisfaction with surgery and shoulder-arm morbidity in breast cancer survivors submitted to breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Renata Freitas-Silva; Délio Marques Conde; Ruffo de Freitas-Júnior; Edson Zangiacomi Martinez
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Health states of women after conservative surgery and radiation for breast cancer.

Authors:  Gary M Freedman; Tianyu Li; Penny R Anderson; Nicos Nicolaou; Andre Konski
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.