Literature DB >> 18612142

Manual stimulation of the suprahyoid-sublingual region diminishes polynnervation of the motor endplates and improves recovery of function after hypoglossal nerve injury in rats.

Emilia Evgenieva1, Patrick Schweigert, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Stoyan Pavlov, Maria Grosheva, Srebrina Angelova, Michael Streppel, Andrey Irintchev, Emmanouil Skouras, Stefanie Kuerten, Nektarios Sinis, Sarah Dunlop, Victoria Radeva, Doychin N Angelov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using the rat facial nerve axotomy model, the authors recently showed that manual stimulation of denervated whiskerpad muscles reduced the posttransectional polyinnervation at the neuromuscular junctions and promoted full recovery of vibrissal whisking.
OBJECTIVE: Prompted by implications for rehabilitation therapy, the authors examined whether manual stimulation of denervated supra- and infrahyoid muscles would also improve recovery after unilateral lesion on the hypoglossal nerve.
METHODS: Adult rats underwent transection of the right hypoglossal nerve. Half of the animals received no postoperative treatment, and the other half were subjected to daily manual stimulation of the suprahyoid/sublingual region for 2 months. Recovery was assessed by measuring the angle of tongue-tip deviation from the midline, degree of collateral axonal branching at the lesion site (counts after retrograde labeling with 2 fluorescent dyes), synaptic input to the hypoglossal motoneurons using synaptophysin immunocytochemistry, tongue-muscles motor representation in the cerebral cortex after c-Fos immunocytochemistry, and portion of polyinnervated neuromuscular junctions.
RESULTS: In animals receiving manual stimulation, the tongue-tip deviation was 37.0 +/- 49.37 degrees , whereas values in control nonstimulated rats were significantly higher (50.1 +/- 9.01 degrees ; P < .05; mean +/- SD). Improved recovery was not associated with reduced collateral axonal branching; there were also no differences in tongue-muscles representation in the motor cortex. However, manual stimulation restored the total synaptic input to levels in intact animals and reduced the proportion of polyinnervated neuromuscular junctions compared with nonstimulated animals.
CONCLUSION: The data show that manual stimulation of denervated muscles improves functional outcome following peripheral nerve injury. This suggests immediate potential for enhancing clinical rehabilitation strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18612142     DOI: 10.1177/1545968308316387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  11 in total

1.  [Regeneration of the facial nerve in comparison to other peripheral nerves : from bench to bedside].

Authors:  A Irintchev; D N Angelov; O Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Manual stimulation of forearm muscles does not improve recovery of motor function after injury to a mixed peripheral nerve.

Authors:  N Sinis; O Guntinas-Lichius; A Irintchev; E Skouras; S Kuerten; S P Pavlov; H E Schaller; S A Dunlop; D N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Daily facial stimulation to improve recovery after facial nerve repair in rats.

Authors:  Robin W Lindsay; James T Heaton; Colin Edwards; Christopher Smitson; Kalpesh Vakharia; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2010 May-Jun

4.  Whisking recovery after automated mechanical stimulation during facial nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Ingrid J Kleiss; Christopher J Knox; Juan S Malo; Henri A M Marres; Tessa A Hadlock; James T Heaton
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.611

5.  Non-invasive stimulation of the vibrissal pad improves recovery of whisking function after simultaneous lesion of the facial and infraorbital nerves in rats.

Authors:  H Bendella; S P Pavlov; M Grosheva; A Irintchev; S K Angelova; D Merkel; N Sinis; K Kaidoglou; E Skouras; S A Dunlop; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A system for delivering mechanical stimulation and robot-assisted therapy to the rat whisker pad during facial nerve regeneration.

Authors:  James T Heaton; Christopher J Knox; Juan S Malo; James B Kobler; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Rodent facial nerve recovery after selected lesions and repair techniques.

Authors:  Tessa A Hadlock; Jeffrey Kowaleski; David Lo; Susan E Mackinnon; James T Heaton
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Mini review: Biomaterials in repair and regeneration of nerve in a volumetric muscle loss.

Authors:  Neelam Ahuja; Kamal Awad; Sara Peper; Marco Brotto; Venu Varanasi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.197

9.  Neuromuscular junction maturation defects precede impaired lower motor neuron connectivity in Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2D mice.

Authors:  James N Sleigh; Stuart J Grice; Robert W Burgess; Kevin Talbot; M Zameel Cader
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 10.  The Role of BDNF in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Activity-Dependent Treatments and Val66Met.

Authors:  Claire Emma McGregor; Arthur W English
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.