Literature DB >> 18612059

Improving mammography screening using best practices and practice enhancement assistants: an Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study.

Cheryl B Aspy1, Margaret Enright, Lawanna Halstead, James W Mold.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In 2004 only 68% of women in Oklahoma over the age of 40 reported having a mammogram in the past 2 years, compared with 75% nationally. Strategies to improve mammography rates have been numerous but have generally included single strategies, such as physician education, practice audit and feedback, and reminders; flow sheets and results have been mixed. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the impact of a practice facilitator and "best practice" interventions on mammography rates in a practice-based research network.
METHODS: A total of 16 practices participated; 8 were assigned to intervention and 8 to usual care. Pre- and post-audits of mammography rates were conducted. Intervention practices received feedback with benchmarking, academic detailing, and the assistance of a practice enhancement assistant to help with practice redesign over a 9-month period.
RESULTS: The groups differed significantly for both the proportion of mammograms offered to eligible patients (P = .043) and for the proportion of patients with current mammograms (P < .015). For the control group, 38% of eligible women were offered a mammogram and 202 (35% of those eligible) actually did have documentation that a mammogram had been performed. Fifty-three percent of the eligible patients in the intervention group were offered a mammogram and 52% of those eligible (n = 332) did have documentation in the chart that the mammogram had been completed.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that these interventions can improve mammography rates in a range of practice settings. These findings are consistent with other studies that have tested multicomponent interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18612059     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.070060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  15 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings.

Authors:  N Bruce Baskerville; Clare Liddy; William Hogg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  The primary care extension program: a catalyst for change.

Authors:  Robert L Phillips; Arthur Kaufman; James W Mold; Kevin Grumbach; Molly Vetter-Smith; Anne Berry; Bridget Teevan Burke
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Impact of Practice Facilitation in Primary Care on Chronic Disease Care Processes and Outcomes: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrew Wang; Teresa Pollack; Lauren A Kadziel; Samuel M Ross; Megan McHugh; Neil Jordan; Abel N Kho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Academic detailing to increase colorectal cancer screening by primary care practices in Appalachian Pennsylvania.

Authors:  William J Curry; Eugene J Lengerich; Brenda C Kluhsman; Marie A Graybill; Jason Z Liao; Eric W Schaefer; Angela M Spleen; Mark B Dignan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Small physician practices in new york needed sustained help to realize gains in quality from use of electronic health records.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Tara F Bishop; Sarah Shih; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The quality of preventive health care delivered to adults: results from a cross-sectional study in Southern Italy.

Authors:  Benedetto Manuti; Paolo Rizza; Aida Bianco; Carmelo G A Nobile; Maria Pavia
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic review.

Authors:  Melissa C Brouwers; Carol De Vito; Lavannya Bahirathan; Angela Carol; June C Carroll; Michelle Cotterchio; Maureen Dobbins; Barbara Lent; Cheryl Levitt; Nancy Lewis; S Elizabeth McGregor; Lawrence Paszat; Carol Rand; Nadine Wathen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline.

Authors:  Melissa C Brouwers; Carol De Vito; Lavannya Bahirathan; Angela Carol; June C Carroll; Michelle Cotterchio; Maureen Dobbins; Barbara Lent; Cheryl Levitt; Nancy Lewis; S Elizabeth McGregor; Lawrence Paszat; Carol Rand; Nadine Wathen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Tomas Pantoja; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Nathalie Colomer; Carla Castañon; Javiera Leniz Martelli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-18

10.  Leveraging practice-based research networks to accelerate implementation and diffusion of chronic kidney disease guidelines in primary care practices: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  James W Mold; Cheryl B Aspy; Paul D Smith; Therese Zink; Lyndee Knox; Paula Darby Lipman; Margot Krauss; D Robert Harris; Chester Fox; Leif I Solberg; Rachel Cohen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.