Literature DB >> 18611629

Comparative evaluation of fleroxacin, ampicillin, trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole, and gentamicin as treatments of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in a rabbit model.

D W Morck1, K Lam, S G McKay, M E Olson, B Prosser, B D Ellis, R Cleeland, J W Costerton.   

Abstract

Fleroxacin, ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and gentamicin were comparatively evaluated for effectiveness in treating experimentally induced catheter-associated urinary tract infection and bacteriuria in a rabbit model with a closed drainage system. Fleroxacin, ampicillin and gentamicin effectively eliminated a lactose-negative, streptomycin-resistant uropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli (WE6933) from bag urine and catheter port urine, while trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole only marginally reduced urine bacterial counts when compared to rabbits that received no antibiotic therapy. Fleroxacin eliminated E. coli from the catheter surfaces and from tissues adjacent to the catheter. Ampicillin or gentamicin therapy also eliminated biofilm bacteria from the catheter surfaces, but did not eliminate th residual bacteria from tissue adjacent to the septic catheters despite achieving urine levels of antibiotics substantially higher than minimum bactericidal concentrations for this pathogen. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was ineffective in eliminating E. coli from the catheter surfaces and the adjacent tissues. The ability of fleroxacin to effectively eliminate biofilm bacteria from catheter surfaces and tissues adjacent to such medical devices in the urinary tract may prove useful in the treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection and bacteriuria in mammals and humans.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 18611629     DOI: 10.1016/0924-8579(94)90018-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  5 in total

1.  The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  H Ceri; M E Olson; C Stremick; R R Read; D Morck; A Buret
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Biofilm bacteria: formation and comparative susceptibility to antibiotics.

Authors:  Merle E Olson; Howard Ceri; Douglas W Morck; Andre G Buret; Ronald R Read
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Urinary catheterization of male rabbits: a new technique and a review of urogenital anatomy.

Authors:  Rajesh K Uthamanthil; Ray Y Hachem; Mihai Gagea; Ruth A Reitzel; Agatha T Borne; Peggy T Tinkey
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 4.  From in vitro to in vivo Models of Bacterial Biofilm-Related Infections.

Authors:  David Lebeaux; Ashwini Chauhan; Olaya Rendueles; Christophe Beloin
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2013-05-13

Review 5.  Biofilms as Promoters of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance and Tolerance.

Authors:  Cristina Uruén; Gema Chopo-Escuin; Jan Tommassen; Raúl C Mainar-Jaime; Jesús Arenas
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.