Literature DB >> 18611423

Establishing objective detection limits for the pepsin digestion assay used in the assessment of genetically modified foods.

A O Ofori-Anti1, H Ariyarathna, L Chen, H L Lee, S N Pramod, R E Goodman.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Guidelines for assessing the potential allergenicity of genetically modified (GM) organisms recommend testing the digestibility of the introduced protein by pepsin. Previous studies detailed the digestion procedure but have not described a simple objective measurement of the extent of digestion nor evaluated the impact of variation in pepsin activity.
METHODS: Samples of eight proteins were digested by pepsin at pH 1.2 and 2.0 using standard conditions (10,000 U of pepsin activity per mg test protein) as well as 5000 and 20,000 units per mg of test protein. An independent digestion assay of hemoglobin was used to verify pepsin activity for each assay. Digestion was stopped in timed samples between 0.5 and 60 min. Digestion samples and undigested protein (10% and 100%) were separated by SDS-PAGE. Residual stained protein bands were measured by image analysis.
RESULTS: The differences in pH and pepsin concentration only had minor effects on digestion of intermediately stable proteins: concanavalin A, ovalbumin, and lysozyme, but not on rapidly digested or stable proteins.
CONCLUSIONS: Verification of pepsin activity and measurement of an objective endpoint of digestion (e.g. (90%) should provide more comparable results for the safety assessment of novel food proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18611423     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  10 in total

1.  Impact of Food Matrices on Digestibility of Allergens and Poorly Allergenic Homologs.

Authors:  J H Akkerdaas; A Cianferoni; E Islamovic; J Kough; G S Ladics; S McClain; L K Poulsen; A Silvanovich; L Pereira Mouriès; R van Ree
Journal:  Front Allergy       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 2.  Suggested improvements for the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants used in foods.

Authors:  Richard E Goodman; Afua O Tetteh
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  The food and environmental safety of Bt crops.

Authors:  Michael S Koch; Jason M Ward; Steven L Levine; James A Baum; John L Vicini; Bruce G Hammond
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Lack of detectable allergenicity in genetically modified maize containing "Cry" proteins as compared to native maize based on in silico & in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Chandni Mathur; Pooran C Kathuria; Pushpa Dahiya; Anand B Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Analyzing pepsin degradation assay conditions used for allergenicity assessments to ensure that pepsin susceptible and pepsin resistant dietary proteins are distinguishable.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Thomas C Edrington; S Bradley Storrs; Kathleen S Crowley; Jason M Ward; Thomas C Lee; Zi L Liu; Bin Li; Kevin C Glenn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluating Potential Risks of Food Allergy and Toxicity of Soy Leghemoglobin Expressed in Pichia pastoris.

Authors:  Yuan Jin; Xiaoyun He; Kwame Andoh-Kumi; Rachel Z Fraser; Mei Lu; Richard E Goodman
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.914

7.  Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins.

Authors:  Natsumi Maeda; Dorota Dulko; Adam Macierzanka; Christian Jungnickel
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Safety assessment of Mpp75Aa1.1, a new ETX_MTX2 protein from Brevibacillus laterosporus that controls western corn rootworm.

Authors:  Cunxi Wang; Gregory J Bean; Chun Ju Chen; Colton R Kessenich; Jiexin Peng; Nicolo R Visconti; Jason S Milligan; Robert G Moore; Jianguo Tan; Thomas C Edrington; Bin Li; Kara S Giddings; David Bowen; Jinhua Luo; Todd Ciche; William J Moar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Should digestion assays be used to estimate persistence of potential allergens in tests for safety of novel food proteins?

Authors:  Santiago Schnell; Rod A Herman
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2009-01-15

10.  Scientific Opinion on development needs for the allergenicity and protein safety assessment of food and feed products derived from biotechnology.

Authors:  Ewen Mullins; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Hanspeter Naegeli; Fabien Nogué; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Antonio Fernandez Dumont; Francisco Javier Moreno
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-01-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.