OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the knowledge of healthcare students after four curricula on infection control and to identify sources of information. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Four healthcare schools at Rouen University (Rouen, France). PARTICIPANTS: Medical students, nursing students, assistant radiologist students, and physiotherapist students taking public health courses. METHODS: To measure students' knowledge of infection control and their sources of information, 6 multiple-choice questions were asked about 3 specific areas: standard precautions, hand hygiene, and nosocomial infection. Each questionnaire section had 10 possible points, for an overall perfect score of 30. The sources of information for these 3 areas were also recorded: self-learning, practice training in wards, formal training in wards, and teaching during the curriculum. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with acceptable level of knowledge. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty students (107 medical students, 78 nursing students, 71 physiotherapist students, and 94 assistant radiologists tudents) were included in the study. The mean overall score (+/- SD) was 21.5 +/- 2.84. Nursing students had a better mean overall score (23.2 +/- 2.35) than did physiotherapist students (21.9 +/- 2.36), medical students (21.1 +/- 2.35), and assistant radiologist students (20.5 +/- 3.04; P.001). The mean scores ( +/- SD) for the component sections of the questionnaire were 8.5 +/- 1.4 for standard precautions, 7.4 +/- 1.26 for hand hygiene,and 5.7 +/- 1.55 for nosocomial infections (P .001). The main source of information was material taught during the curriculum. CONCLUSION: The overall score for infection control indicated that instruction was effective; however, knowledge levels were different by area (the best scores were results of tests of standard precautions) and curriculum (nursing students achieved the best overall score). Ward training for daily infection control practice (ie, bedside instructions training and course work) could be improved for healthcare students.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the knowledge of healthcare students after four curricula on infection control and to identify sources of information. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Four healthcare schools at Rouen University (Rouen, France). PARTICIPANTS: Medical students, nursing students, assistant radiologist students, and physiotherapist students taking public health courses. METHODS: To measure students' knowledge of infection control and their sources of information, 6 multiple-choice questions were asked about 3 specific areas: standard precautions, hand hygiene, and nosocomial infection. Each questionnaire section had 10 possible points, for an overall perfect score of 30. The sources of information for these 3 areas were also recorded: self-learning, practice training in wards, formal training in wards, and teaching during the curriculum. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with acceptable level of knowledge. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty students (107 medical students, 78 nursing students, 71 physiotherapist students, and 94 assistant radiologists tudents) were included in the study. The mean overall score (+/- SD) was 21.5 +/- 2.84. Nursing students had a better mean overall score (23.2 +/- 2.35) than did physiotherapist students (21.9 +/- 2.36), medical students (21.1 +/- 2.35), and assistant radiologist students (20.5 +/- 3.04; P.001). The mean scores ( +/- SD) for the component sections of the questionnaire were 8.5 +/- 1.4 for standard precautions, 7.4 +/- 1.26 for hand hygiene,and 5.7 +/- 1.55 for nosocomial infections (P .001). The main source of information was material taught during the curriculum. CONCLUSION: The overall score for infection control indicated that instruction was effective; however, knowledge levels were different by area (the best scores were results of tests of standard precautions) and curriculum (nursing students achieved the best overall score). Ward training for daily infection control practice (ie, bedside instructions training and course work) could be improved for healthcare students.
Authors: David Russell; Dawn W Dowding; Margaret V McDonald; Victoria Adams; Robert J Rosati; Elaine L Larson; Jingjing Shang Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Ajediran I Bello; Eunice N Asiedu; Babatunde O A Adegoke; Jonathan N A Quartey; Kwadwo O Appiah-Kubi; Bertha Owusu-Ansah Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2011-08-11
Authors: Tarek Tawfik Amin; Khalid Ibrahim Al Noaim; Mohammed Ahmed Bu Saad; Turki Ahmed Al Malhm; Abdullah Abdulaziz Al Mulhim; Marwah Abdulaziz Al Awas Journal: Glob J Health Sci Date: 2013-04-21