Literature DB >> 1861002

Differential sensitivity to vowel continua in Old World monkeys (Macaca) and humans.

J M Sinnott1, N A Kreiter.   

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that monkey pure tone frequency discrimination is quantitatively and qualitatively very different from that of humans: Monkey DLs at 1.0 and 2.0 kHz are up to 20 times larger than human DLs, and monkeys DLs increase as sensation level increases, in contrast to human DLs [Sinnott et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1977-1985 (1985); Sinnott et al., J. Comp. Psychol. 101, 126-131 (1987)]. These results led to an hypothesis that monkey frequency discrimination is more dependent upon "rate" coding than is that of humans. The present study compared monkey and human DLs for formant frequency changes along three synthetic vowel continua /I-i/, /ae-epsilon/, and /a-v/. Here, monkey DLs for formants near 1.0 and 2.0 kHz (32-48 Hz) were only about two to three times larger than human DLs (11-21 Hz), and both monkeys and humans exhibited relatively similar, flat sensation level functions. Taken together, these data indicate that monkey and human frequency discrimination is more similar in the case of a complex vowel stimulus than in the case of a simple pure tone stimulus. Results are discussed in relation to "rate" versus "temporal" coding of tones and vowels in the auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1861002     DOI: 10.1121/1.400974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Encoding of vowel-like sounds in the auditory nerve: model predictions of discrimination performance.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral integration plasticity in cat auditory cortex induced by perceptual training.

Authors:  M Diane Keeling; Barbara M Calhoun; Katharina Krüger; Daniel B Polley; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cocaine's effects on speech sound identification and reaction times in baboons.

Authors:  R D Hienz; T J Zarcone; D A Pyle; J V Brady
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Vowel Formant Frequency Discrimination in Cats: Comparison of Auditory Nerve Representations and Psychophysical Thresholds.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Aileen Huang; Glenn LE Prell; Robert D Hienz
Journal:  Audit Neurosci       Date:  1996-04-24

6.  Spectral timbre perception in ferrets: discrimination of artificial vowels under different listening conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Kerry M M Walker; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cross modal perception of body size in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Anna M Taylor; David Reby; Karen McComb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Neural and behavioral investigations into timbre perception.

Authors:  Stephen M Town; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13

9.  Laminar differences in response to simple and spectro-temporally complex sounds in the primary auditory cortex of ketamine-anesthetized gerbils.

Authors:  Markus K Schaefer; Manfred Kössl; Julio C Hechavarría
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Monkeys share the neurophysiological basis for encoding sound periodicities captured by the frequency-following response with humans.

Authors:  Yaneri A Ayala; Alexandre Lehmann; Hugo Merchant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.