Literature DB >> 18609408

Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings.

Darryl W Schneider1, Frederick Verbruggen.   

Abstract

When switching tasks, performance tends to be worse for n - 2 repetitions than with n - 2 switches. This n - 2 repetition cost has been hypothesized to reflect task-set inhibition: specifically, inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings involved in response selection. This hypothesis leads to divergent predictions for situations in which all tasks involve the same stimulus categories: An n - 2 repetition cost is predicted when response sets differ across tasks, but not when the response set stays the same. The authors tested these predictions by having subjects perform relative judgements with different reference points. In Experiment 1, the stimulus categories were the same across reference points, but the response set either differed or stayed the same (the multiple- and single-mapping conditions, respectively). An n - 2 repetition cost was found in the multiple-mapping condition but not in the single-mapping condition. Experiment 2 provided evidence against the possibility that these divergent effects reflected differences in memory load. These findings confirm predictions that link n - 2 repetition costs to inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18609408     DOI: 10.1080/17470210802138511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  10 in total

1.  On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition.

Authors:  James A Grange; Ion Juvina; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-11

2.  Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Martijn J M Lamers; Ardi Roelofs; Inge M Rabeling-Keus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

3.  Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-13

Review 4.  The role of inhibition in task switching: a review.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Miriam Gade; Stefanie Schuch; Andrea M Philipp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

5.  Task preparation and task inhibition: a comment on Koch, Gade, Schuch, & Philipp (2010).

Authors:  James A Grange; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

6.  Brain activity related to the ability to inhibit previous task sets: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Anson J Whitmer; Marie T Banich
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-31

8.  The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching.

Authors:  Corinne Pettigrew; Randi C Martin
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Inhibitory Processes for Critical Situations - The Role of n-2 Task Repetition Costs in Human Multitasking Situations.

Authors:  Miriam Gade; Iring Koch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Cognitive control in number processing: new evidence from number compatibility effects in task-switching.

Authors:  A Schliephake; J Bahnmueller; K Willmes; I Koch; K Moeller
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-02-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.