Literature DB >> 18609320

Effects of examiner error on neuropsychological test results in a multi-site study.

E Kozora1, S Kongs, M Hampton, Lening Zhang.   

Abstract

This study compared the difference between original and "corrected" neuropsychological test scores at baseline and following 1 year of experience in 17 non-psychology trained examiners. Test protocols were reviewed for errors in instruction, administration, recording, and scoring. Fewer than 3% of the test scaled scores showed a correction of greater than 1 SD. At baseline, individual test scores that changed T-score classification occurred on Digit Symbol, Trails B, and Logical Memory I and II. At one year, significant classification changes remained for Logical Memory I and II (25% and 15%). Scoring of subjective tests remains problematic and centralized re-scoring is recommended.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18609320     DOI: 10.1080/13854040701679025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1385-4046            Impact factor:   3.535


  2 in total

1.  Hyperbolic discounting rates and risk for problematic alcohol use in youth enrolled in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development study.

Authors:  Robert J Kohler; Sarah D Lichenstein; Sarah W Yip
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 4.093

2.  Improving the quality of cognitive screening assessments: ACEmobile, an iPad-based version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III.

Authors:  Craig G J Newman; Adam D Bevins; John P Zajicek; John R Hodges; Emil Vuillermoz; Jennifer M Dickenson; Denise S Kelly; Simona Brown; Rupert F Noad
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2017-12-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.