OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether routinely performed ECGs in older people from the general population have added value for cardiovascular risk management beyond the information that is already available from their medical records. DESIGN: Observational, prospective cohort study. SETTING: General population. SUBJECTS: A total of 566 participants aged 85 years (377 women, 189 men). METHODS: Lifelong history of cardiovascular disease was assessed through medical records obtained from general practitioners. Baseline ECGs were evaluated for prior myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation. During a 5-year follow-up period, complete cardiovascular mortality and morbidity data were gathered. RESULTS: During 5 years of follow-up, 262/566 (46%) participants died, of whom 102/262 (39%) died from cardiovascular disease. Participants with a history of cardiovascular disease at age 85 years (284/566, 50%) had an increased cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-4.1) and morbidity (HR (myocardial infarction) 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.6; HR (stroke) 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.9) compared with those without such a history. Participants with major ECG abnormalities (102/566, 18%) had an increased cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8), but no increase of cardiovascular morbidity compared with those without major ECG abnormalities. In both participants with and without a history of cardiovascular disease, the presence of major ECG abnormalities was not associated with increased cardiovascular mortality or morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In older people from the general population, a history of cardiovascular disease is a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Although abnormal findings on routine ECGs predict cardiovascular mortality, they do not provide additional prognostic information beyond the information available from medical records. Therefore, when accurate medical records are available, programmatic ECG recording is not effective in older people.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether routinely performed ECGs in older people from the general population have added value for cardiovascular risk management beyond the information that is already available from their medical records. DESIGN: Observational, prospective cohort study. SETTING: General population. SUBJECTS: A total of 566 participants aged 85 years (377 women, 189 men). METHODS: Lifelong history of cardiovascular disease was assessed through medical records obtained from general practitioners. Baseline ECGs were evaluated for prior myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation. During a 5-year follow-up period, complete cardiovascular mortality and morbidity data were gathered. RESULTS: During 5 years of follow-up, 262/566 (46%) participants died, of whom 102/262 (39%) died from cardiovascular disease. Participants with a history of cardiovascular disease at age 85 years (284/566, 50%) had an increased cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-4.1) and morbidity (HR (myocardial infarction) 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.6; HR (stroke) 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.9) compared with those without such a history. Participants with major ECG abnormalities (102/566, 18%) had an increased cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8), but no increase of cardiovascular morbidity compared with those without major ECG abnormalities. In both participants with and without a history of cardiovascular disease, the presence of major ECG abnormalities was not associated with increased cardiovascular mortality or morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In older people from the general population, a history of cardiovascular disease is a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Although abnormal findings on routine ECGs predict cardiovascular mortality, they do not provide additional prognostic information beyond the information available from medical records. Therefore, when accurate medical records are available, programmatic ECG recording is not effective in older people.
Authors: V Fuster; L E Rydén; R W Asinger; D S Cannom; H J Crijns; R L Frye; J L Halperin; G N Kay; W W Klein; S Lévy; R L McNamara; E N Prystowsky; L S Wann; D G Wyse Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sidney C Smith; Jerilyn Allen; Steven N Blair; Robert O Bonow; Lawrence M Brass; Gregg C Fonarow; Scott M Grundy; Loren Hiratzka; Daniel Jones; Harlan M Krumholz; Lori Mosca; Richard C Pasternak; Thomas Pearson; Marc A Pfeffer; Kathryn A Taubert Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-05-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wouter de Ruijter; Rudi G J Westendorp; Peter W Macfarlane; J Wouter Jukema; Willem J J Assendelft; Jacobijn Gussekloo Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sheena E Ramsay; Peter H Whincup; Debbie A Lawlor; Olia Papacosta; Lucy T Lennon; Mary C Thomas; Shah Ebrahim; Richard W Morris Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-01-09
Authors: Reto Auer; Douglas C Bauer; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Javed Butler; Lauren J Min; Jacques Cornuz; Suzanne Satterfield; Anne B Newman; Eric Vittinghoff; Nicolas Rodondi Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Paul H H Houben; Ron A G Winkens; Trudy van der Weijden; Renee C R M Vossen; André J M Naus; Richard P T M Grol Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Alice T Yamada; Renata X Baldow; Carla Ribeiro; Wilma N Ribeiro; Carolina Peruzzi; Nilce M Matsuda; Alfredo J Mansur Journal: Perm J Date: 2014-03-31
Authors: Wouter de Ruijter; Rudi G J Westendorp; Willem J J Assendelft; Wendy P J den Elzen; Anton J M de Craen; Saskia le Cessie; Jacobijn Gussekloo Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-01-08