Literature DB >> 18608849

An fMRI study of processing novel metaphoric sentences.

N Mashal1, M Faust, T Hendler, M Jung-Beeman.   

Abstract

Due to inconsistent findings, the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in processing metaphoric language is controversial. The present study examined the possibility that these inconsistent findings may be due, at least partly, to differences in the type (i.e., words vs sentences) or the familiarity of the linguistic material. Previous research has shown that novel two-word metaphoric expressions showed stronger activation in the right homologue of Wernicke's area for the novel metaphors than for both literal expressions and unrelated word pairs. In the present study fMRI was used to identify the left (LH) and the right hemisphere (RH) neural networks associated with processing unfamiliar, novel metaphoric sentences taken from poetry, as compared to those involved in processing familiar literal sentences and unfamiliar nonsensical sentences. Across participants, several left lateralised brain regions showed stronger activation for novel metaphoric sentences than for the nonsensical sentences although both types of sentence represent unfamiliar linguistic expressions. Moreover, the metaphoric sentences elicited more activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the posterior middle temporal gyri than did both the literal sentences and the nonsensical sentences. The increased activation in these brain regions might reflect the enhanced demand on the episodic and semantic memory systems in order to generate de-novo verbal semantic associations. The involvement of the left posterior middle temporal gyri could reflect extra reliance on classical brain structures devoted to sentence comprehension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18608849     DOI: 10.1080/13576500802049433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laterality        ISSN: 1357-650X


  24 in total

Review 1.  Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution.

Authors:  Dietrich Stout; Thierry Chaminade
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Hippocampus and amygdala: An insight-related network involved in metaphorical solution to mental distress problem.

Authors:  Fei Yu; Jianxin Zhang; Jin Fan; Jing Luo; Wencai Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The role of the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  Jie Yang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The influence of context on hemispheric recruitment during metaphor processing.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Larson J Hogstrom
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  In defense of abstract conceptual representations.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

7.  Mixing metaphors in the cerebral hemispheres: what happens when careers collide?

Authors:  Selmaan Chettih; Frank H Durgin; Daniel J Grodner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  From novel to familiar: tuning the brain for metaphors.

Authors:  Eileen R Cardillo; Christine E Watson; Gwenda L Schmidt; Alexander Kranjec; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The influence of sentence novelty and figurativeness on brain activity.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Kyle T Barrett; Larson J Hogstrom
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  Beyond laterality: a critical assessment of research on the neural basis of metaphor.

Authors:  Gwenda L Schmidt; Alexander Kranjec; Eileen R Cardillo; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 2.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.