Literature DB >> 1860848

In vivo effect of asparagine in the hydrophobic region of the signal sequence.

J Goldstein1, S Lehnhardt, M Inouye.   

Abstract

On the basis of the biophysical studies on the synthetic mutant (Ile-8----Asn) OmpA signal peptide in the preceding paper (Hoyt, D. C., and Gierasch, L.M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 14406-14412), the in vivo effects of the same mutation were examined by fusing the mutant OmpA signal sequence to Staphylococcus aureus nuclease or TEM beta-lactamase. The mutation in which the isoleucine residue at position 8 of the OmpA signal sequence of Escherichia coli was replaced with a neutral polar residue, asparagine, resulted in a defective signal peptide. The mutant signal sequence was unable to be processed, and the precursor molecule accumulated in the cytoplasmic as well as in the membrane fractions, indicating that the Ile-8----Asn OmpA signal sequence is not competent for translocating nuclease A or beta-lactamase across the membrane. This result is consistent with the in vitro studies on the Ile-8----Asn OmpA signal peptide, which indicated that the mutant signal peptide was unable to penetrate into the hydrophobic core of the lipid bilayer. Other asparagine or glutamine substitution mutations in the hydrophobic region of the OmpA signal sequence were also examined. Interestingly, the OmpA signal sequence with either Ile-8----Gln, Val-10----Asn, or Leu-12----Asn mutation was completely defective as the Ile-8----Asn OmpA signal sequence, while the Ile-6----Asn and Ala-9----Asn OmpA nucleases were able to be processed to secrete nuclease, although the processing occurred at a much slower rate than the wild-type OmpA nuclease. These results indicate that the defects depend on the position of the lesion in the hydrophobic core of the OmpA signal sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1860848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biophysical studies of recognition sequences for targeting and folding.

Authors:  L M Gierasch; J D Jones; S J Landry; S J Stradley
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 2.  Interactions that drive Sec-dependent bacterial protein transport.

Authors:  Sharyn L Rusch; Debra A Kendall
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Sec-mediated secretion of bacteriocin enterocin P by Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  Carmen Herranz; Arnold J M Driessen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Roles of the signal peptide and mature domains in the secretion and maturation of the neutral metalloprotease from Streptomyces cacaoi.

Authors:  S C Chang; M H Su; Y H Lee
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Mapping of the signal peptide-binding domain of Escherichia coli SecA using Förster resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  Sarah M Auclair; Julia P Moses; Monika Musial-Siwek; Debra A Kendall; Donald B Oliver; Ishita Mukerji
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 6.  Signal peptides for recombinant protein secretion in bacterial expression systems.

Authors:  Roland Freudl
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.328

7.  Plastid chaperone HSP90C guides precursor proteins to the SEC translocase for thylakoid transport.

Authors:  Tim Jiang; Bona Mu; Rongmin Zhao
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 6.992

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.