Literature DB >> 18608322

Grasping Weber's illusion: The effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.

Helen A Anema1, Vincent W J Wolswijk, Carla Ruis, H Chris Dijkerman.   

Abstract

Weber found that distances between tactile stimuli on a high-receptor-density area are perceived as being larger than identical distances on a low-receptor-density area (Weber's illusion). Previous studies of visual illusions suggest that illusion effects vary with the type of response given. Here we tested a modified version of Weber's illusion in which a solid object was placed on the forearm or hand. Blindfolded participants were required either to give a size estimation or to grasp the object. The results showed that size estimation of solid objects was consistent with Weber's illusion, whereas grasping responses showed an opposite pattern (e.g., larger hand opening for objects on the forearm). A second experiment showed that this pattern is not due to biomechanical differences induced by the difference in spatial position of the target objects on the hand and arm. We suggest that the larger grip aperture when grasping objects on the arm were due to an increase in safety margin as a response to greater uncertainty about the object dimensions due to reduced receptor density.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18608322     DOI: 10.1080/02643290802041323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  The recalibration of tactile perception during tool use is body-part specific.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Andrew Cawley-Bennett; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  No Correlation between Distorted Body Representations Underlying Tactile Distance Perception and Position Sense.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Rosa Morcom
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Tactile distance illusions reflect a coherent stretch of tactile space.

Authors:  Federico Fiori; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  A Conceptual Model of Tactile Processing across Body Features of Size, Shape, Side, and Spatial Location.

Authors:  Luigi Tamè; Elena Azañón; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26

5.  Size Constancy Mechanisms: Empirical Evidence from Touch.

Authors:  Luigi Tamè; Suzuki Limbu; Rebecca Harlow; Mita Parikh; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01

6.  Perceptual and Conceptual Distortions of Implicit Hand Maps.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Stefania Mattioni; Nataşa Ganea
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Hand Posture Modulates Perceived Tactile Distance.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mind the Gap: The Effects of Temporal and Spatial Separation in Localization of Dual Touches on the Hand.

Authors:  Renata Sadibolova; Luigi Tamè; Eamonn Walsh; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.