CONCLUSION: Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) without intubation has the advantages of both conventional general anesthesia and local anesthesia. It is useful in laryngeal framework surgery because intraoperative voice monitoring while the patient remains awake is required. OBJECTIVE: In laryngeal framework surgery, it is desirable to monitor the voice during surgery. However, surgery is conducted under general anesthesia, although such a procedure renders the patient unable to phonate during surgery. We conducted TIVA without intubation, allowing patients to breathe spontaneously while undergoing operation, and succeeded in intraoperative voice monitoring with satisfactory postoperative voice production. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 21 patients who underwent surgery. For TIVA, propofol and pentazocine were used as a sedative and analgesic, respectively. A bispectral index (BIS) monitor was used to measure the depth of the anesthesia. Before the vocal folds were to be rotated, propofol administration was interrupted to arouse and instruct the patient to phonate. Guided by the phonation, the vocal folds were correctly positioned. Then propofol administration was resumed, and the wound was closed. RESULTS: The BIS value during continued administration of propofol was around 60, but exceeded 90 in all patients within 233.6 +/- 64.5 s after cessation. They clearly remembered the conversation they had with us during surgery.
CONCLUSION: Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) without intubation has the advantages of both conventional general anesthesia and local anesthesia. It is useful in laryngeal framework surgery because intraoperative voice monitoring while the patient remains awake is required. OBJECTIVE: In laryngeal framework surgery, it is desirable to monitor the voice during surgery. However, surgery is conducted under general anesthesia, although such a procedure renders the patient unable to phonate during surgery. We conducted TIVA without intubation, allowing patients to breathe spontaneously while undergoing operation, and succeeded in intraoperative voice monitoring with satisfactory postoperative voice production. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 21 patients who underwent surgery. For TIVA, propofol and pentazocine were used as a sedative and analgesic, respectively. A bispectral index (BIS) monitor was used to measure the depth of the anesthesia. Before the vocal folds were to be rotated, propofol administration was interrupted to arouse and instruct the patient to phonate. Guided by the phonation, the vocal folds were correctly positioned. Then propofol administration was resumed, and the wound was closed. RESULTS: The BIS value during continued administration of propofol was around 60, but exceeded 90 in all patients within 233.6 +/- 64.5 s after cessation. They clearly remembered the conversation they had with us during surgery.