Literature DB >> 18607812

Filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators against 4 to 30 nanometer-size nanoparticles.

Samy Rengasamy1, William P King, Benjamin C Eimer, Ronald E Shaffer.   

Abstract

This study investigated the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) against six different monodisperse silver aerosol particles in the range of 4-30 nm diameter. A particle test system was developed and standardized for measuring the penetration of monodisperse silver particles. For respirator testing, five models of N95 and two models of P100 filtering facepiece respirators were challenged with monodisperse silver aerosol particles of 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 30 nm at 85 L/min flow rate and percentage penetrations were measured. Consistent with single-fiber filtration theory, N95 and P100 respirators challenged with silver monodisperse particles showed a decrease in percentage penetration with a decrease in particle diameter down to 4 nm. Penetrations less than 1 particle/30 min for 4-8 nm particles for one P100 respirator model, and 4-12 nm particles for the other P100 model, were observed. Experiments were also carried out with larger than 20 nm monodisperse NaCl particles using a TSI 3160 Fractional Efficiency Tester. NaCl aerosol penetration levels of 20 nm and 30 nm (overlapping sizes) particles were compared with silver aerosols of the same sizes by a three-way ANOVA analysis. A significant (p < 0.001) difference between NaCl and silver aerosol penetration levels was obtained after adjusting for particle sizes and manufacturers. A significant (p = 0.001) interaction with manufacturers indicated the difference in NaCl, and silver aerosol penetrations were not the same across manufacturers. The two aerosols had the same effect across 20 nm and 30 nm sizes as shown by the absence of any significant (p = 0.163) interaction with particle sizes. In the case of P100 FFRs, a significant (p < 0.001) difference between NaCl and silver aerosol (20 nm and 30 nm) penetrations was observed for both respirator models tested. The filtration data for 4-30 nm monodisperse particles supports previous studies that indicate NIOSH-approved air-purifying respirators provide expected levels of filtration protection against nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18607812     DOI: 10.1080/15459620802275387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of environmental filtration control of engineered nanoparticles using the Harvard Versatile Engineered Nanomaterial Generation System (VENGES).

Authors:  Candace S-J Tsai; Manuel E Echevarría-Vega; Georgios A Sotiriou; Christopher Santeufemio; Daniel Schmidt; Philip Demokritou; Michael Ellenbecker
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Taking stock of the occupational safety and health challenges of nanotechnology: 2000-2015.

Authors:  P A Schulte; G Roth; L L Hodson; V Murashov; M D Hoover; R Zumwalde; E D Kuempel; C L Geraci; A B Stefaniak; V Castranova; J Howard
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Investigation of Mask Efficiency for Loose-Fitting Masks against Ultrafine Particles and Effect on Airway Deposition Efficiency.

Authors:  Wei-Chung Su; Jinho Lee; Jinxiang Xi; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Aerosol Air Qual Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Occupational nanosafety considerations for carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibers.

Authors:  Vincent Castranova; Paul A Schulte; Ralph D Zumwalde
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 22.384

5.  Effects of breathing frequency and flow rate on the total inward leakage of an elastomeric half-mask donned on an advanced manikin headform.

Authors:  Xinjian He; Sergey A Grinshpun; Tiina Reponen; Roy McKay; Michael S Bergman; Ziqing Zhuang
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2013-10-08

6.  Nanoparticles, human health hazard and regulation.

Authors:  Anthony Seaton; Lang Tran; Robert Aitken; Kenneth Donaldson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Engineered nanomaterials: exposures, hazards, and risk prevention.

Authors:  Robert A Yokel; Robert C Macphail
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.646

8.  Nanoparticle Filtration Performance of Commercially Available Dust Masks.

Authors:  Samy Rengasamy; Benjamin C Eimer; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Int Soc Respir Prot       Date:  2008 Spring-Summer

9.  Comparison of Simulated Workplace Protection Factors Offered by N95 and P100 Filtering Facepiece and Elastomeric Half-Mask Respirators against Particles of 10 to 400 nm.

Authors:  Xinjian He; Evanly Vo; M Horvatin; Y Liu; M Bergman; Z Zhuang
Journal:  J Nanotechnol Mater Sci       Date:  2015-09-07

Review 10.  A Review on the Respiratory System Toxicity of Carbon Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Maricica Pacurari; Kristine Lowe; Paul B Tchounwou; Ramzi Kafoury
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.