Literature DB >> 18607248

Normal or near normal myocardial perfusion stress imaging in patients with severe coronary artery disease.

Joseph A Diamond1, Amgad N Makaryus, David A Sandler, Joseph Machac, Milena J Henzlova.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Normal or near normal myocardial perfusion stress imaging (MPI) suggests the absence of life-threatening coronary artery disease (CAD). Nevertheless, there are instances where severe left main or three-vessel CAD may be present despite no significant perfusion abnormalities on MPI.
METHODS: Review of Tl-201 or Tc-99m sestamibi MPI over a period of 5 years to ascertain the features that may prevent misdiagnosis. Out of 9171 tests, 3992 (44%) were interpreted as normal or near normal. For clinical reasons, 98 (2%) of these patients underwent coronary angiography within 6 months.
RESULTS: A total of 3992 patients were interpreted as normal or near normal. Seventy (22 men/48 women; 58 +/- 13 years) did not have obstructive CAD. Nine (six men/three women; 64 +/- 8 years) had either left main (n = 3), three-vessel CAD with or without left main (n = 3) or severe proximal left anterior descending (n = 3) disease. Although both normal patients and patients with CAD had similar proportions of imaging artifacts, those with severe CAD had significantly more markers of CAD (increased lung Tl-201 uptake, transient ischemic cavity dilatation, stress-induced ST-segment depression, chest pain, and/or hypotension with exercise; P < 0.01; no CAD vs. severe CAD; two-tail Fisher's Exact Test). Similarly, patients with moderate CAD by coronary angiography (n = 19), and a random sample of 250 patients (82 men/168 women; 62 +/- 14 years) with normal or near normal MPI who did not undergo coronary angiography, had similar proportions of imaging artifacts but significantly fewer markers of CAD.
CONCLUSION: When dealing with individual patients, the referring physician and the interpreter of MPI studies should consider severe CAD when there are markers of CAD despite normal or near normal perfusion images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18607248     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3282f88bc5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  6 in total

Review 1.  Left main coronary artery disease: A review of the spectrum of noninvasive diagnostic modalities.

Authors:  Nishtha Sareen; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Uncertainty of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Chest Pain Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Htoo Kyaw; Sivacharan Buddhavarapu; Joseph Abboud; Deepika Misra
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

3.  Value of reserve pulse pressure in improving the risk stratification of patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Deepak Thomas; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Usha Govindarajulu; Daniel E Forman; Samia Mora; Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Prevalence, location, and extent of significant coronary artery disease in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Shu Yokota; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Mohamed Mouden; Jorik R Timmer; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Angina Pectoris and Myocardial Ischemia in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Role of Diagnostic Tests.

Authors:  Gaetano Antonio Lanza
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Clinical implications of referral bias in the diagnostic performance of exercise testing for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Saul Blecker; Michael R Elashoff; Jerome J Federspiel; Dorice L Vieira; Gaurav Sharma; Mark Monane; Steven Rosenberg; Charles E Phelps; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.