BACKGROUND: More than 95% of neonatal deaths occur in developing countries, approximately 50% at home. Few data are available on the impact of hand-washing practices by birth attendants or caretakers on neonatal mortality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between birth attendant and maternal hand-washing practices and neonatal mortality in rural Nepal. DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort study. SETTING:Sarlahi District in rural southern Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Newborn infants were originally enrolled in a community-based trial assessing the effect of skin and/or umbilical cord cleansing with chlorhexidine on neonatal mortalityin southern Nepal. A total of 23,662 newborns were enrolled and observed through 28 days of life. MAIN EXPOSURES: Questionnaires were administered to mothers on days 1 and 14 after delivery to identify care practices and risk factors for mortality and infection. Three hand-washing categories were defined: (1) birth attendant hand washing with soap and water before assisting with delivery, (2) maternal hand washing with soap and water or antiseptic before handling the baby, and (3) combined birth attendant and maternal hand washing. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality within the neonatal period. RESULTS: Birth attendant hand washing was related to a statistically significant lower mortality rate among neonates (adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.99), as was maternal hand washing (adjusted RR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.82). There was a 41% lower mortality rate among neonates exposed to both hand-washing practices (adjusted RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Birth attendant and maternal hand washing with soap and water were associated with significantly lower rates of neonatal mortality. Measures to improve or promote birth attendant and maternal hand washing could improve neonatal survival rates.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: More than 95% of neonatal deaths occur in developing countries, approximately 50% at home. Few data are available on the impact of hand-washing practices by birth attendants or caretakers on neonatal mortality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between birth attendant and maternal hand-washing practices and neonatal mortality in rural Nepal. DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort study. SETTING: Sarlahi District in rural southern Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Newborn infants were originally enrolled in a community-based trial assessing the effect of skin and/or umbilical cord cleansing with chlorhexidine on neonatal mortality in southern Nepal. A total of 23,662 newborns were enrolled and observed through 28 days of life. MAIN EXPOSURES: Questionnaires were administered to mothers on days 1 and 14 after delivery to identify care practices and risk factors for mortality and infection. Three hand-washing categories were defined: (1) birth attendant hand washing with soap and water before assisting with delivery, (2) maternal hand washing with soap and water or antiseptic before handling the baby, and (3) combined birth attendant and maternal hand washing. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality within the neonatal period. RESULTS:Birth attendant hand washing was related to a statistically significant lower mortality rate among neonates (adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.99), as was maternal hand washing (adjusted RR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.82). There was a 41% lower mortality rate among neonates exposed to both hand-washing practices (adjusted RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Birth attendant and maternal hand washing with soap and water were associated with significantly lower rates of neonatal mortality. Measures to improve or promote birth attendant and maternal hand washing could improve neonatal survival rates.
Authors: Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Simon Cousens; Taghreed Adam; Neff Walker; Luc de Bernis Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Mar 12-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Stephen P Luby; Mubina Agboatwalla; John Painter; Arshad Altaf; Ward Billhimer; Bruce Keswick; Robert M Hoekstra Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Stephen P Luby; Mubina Agboatwalla; Daniel R Feikin; John Painter; Ward Billhimer; Arshad Altaf; Robert M Hoekstra Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jul 16-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Luke C Mullany; Gary L Darmstadt; Subarna K Khatry; Joanne Katz; Steven C LeClerq; Shardaram Shrestha; Ramesh Adhikari; James M Tielsch Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-03-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dominique J Karas; Luke C Mullany; Joanne Katz; Subarna K Khatry; Steven C LeClerq; Gary L Darmstadt; James M Tielsch Journal: J Trop Pediatr Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 1.165
Authors: Anandi N Sheth; Elizabeth T Russo; Manoj Menon; Kathleen Wannemuehler; Merri Weinger; Amose C Kudzala; Blessius Tauzie; Humphreys D Masuku; Tapona E Msowoya; Robert Quick Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Pavani K Ram; Farzana Begum; Christina Crabtree-Ide; Mohammad Rofi Uddin; Anne M Weaver; Md Golam Dostogir Harun; Jelena V Allen; Swapna Kumar; Sharifa Nasreen; Stephen P Luby; Shams El Arifeen Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Sunkyung Kim; Allison C Brown; Jennifer Murphy; Jared Oremo; Mercy Owuor; Rosebel Ouda; Bobbie Person; Robert Quick Journal: Water Res Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 11.236
Authors: Bankole Peter Kuti; Tinuade A Ogunlesi; Olabisi Oduwole; Chukwudi Oringanje; Ekong E Udoh; Martin M Meremikwu Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-01-20