| Literature DB >> 18606562 |
Anil K Seth1, Zoltán Dienes, Axel Cleeremans, Morten Overgaard, Luiz Pessoa.
Abstract
The resurgent science of consciousness has been accompanied by a recent emphasis on the problem of measurement. Having dependable measures of consciousness is essential both for mapping experimental evidence to theory and for designing perspicuous experiments. Here, we review a series of behavioural and brain-based measures, assessing their ability to track graded consciousness and clarifying how they relate to each other by showing what theories are presupposed by each. We identify possible and actual conflicts among measures that can stimulate new experiments, and we conclude that measures must prove themselves by iteratively building knowledge in the context of theoretical frameworks. Advances in measuring consciousness have implications for basic cognitive neuroscience, for comparative studies of consciousness and for clinical applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18606562 PMCID: PMC2767381 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Cogn Sci ISSN: 1364-6613 Impact factor: 20.229