Literature DB >> 18606205

Cytotoxic and phenotypic effects of uranium and lead on osteoblastic cells are highly dependent on metal speciation.

S Milgram1, M Carrière, C Thiebault, L Malaval, B Gouget.   

Abstract

Bone is one of the main retention organs for uranium (U) and lead (Pb). The clinical effects of U or Pb poisoning are well known: acute and chronic intoxications impair bone formation. However, only few studies dealt with the cellular and molecular mechanisms of their toxicity. The purpose of this study was to investigate acute cytotoxicity of U and Pb and their phenotypic effects on rat and human osteoblasts, the cells responsible for bone formation. The most likely species of the toxicants in contact with cells after blood contamination were selected for cell exposure. Results showed that the cytotoxic effect of U and Pb is highly dependent on their speciation. Thus, Pb was cytotoxic when left free in the exposure medium or when complexed with carbonate, cysteine or citrate, but not when complexed with albumin or phosphate, under an insoluble form. U was cytotoxic whatever its speciation, but differences in sensitivity were observed as a function of speciation. Population growth recovery could be obtained after exposure to low doses of U or Pb, except for some U-carbonate complexes which had irreversible effects whatever the dose. The activation of two markers of bone formation and mineralization, osteocalcin and bone sialoprotein (BSP), was observed after exposure to non-toxic doses or non-toxic species of U or Pb while their inhibition was observed after toxic exposure to both metals. This work provides new elements to better understand the complex mechanisms of U and Pb toxicity to osteoblasts. Our results also illustrate the importance of a strictly controlled speciation of the metals in toxicological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18606205     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  6 in total

1.  Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 and DNA repair by uranium.

Authors:  Karen L Cooper; Erica J Dashner; Ranalda Tsosie; Young Mi Cho; Johnnye Lewis; Laurie G Hudson
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Low doses of uranium and osteoclastic bone resorption: key reciprocal effects evidenced using new in vitro biomimetic models of bone matrix.

Authors:  Tatiana Gritsaenko; Valérie Pierrefite-Carle; Gaëlle Creff; Bastien Simoneau; Agnès Hagège; Delphine Farlay; Sophie Pagnotta; François Orange; Xavier Jaurand; Christophe Den Auwer; Georges F Carle; Sabine Santucci-Darmanin
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Methods for Analyzing the Impacts of Natural Uranium on In Vitro Osteoclastogenesis.

Authors:  Tatiana Gritsaenko; Valérie Pierrefite-Carle; Gaëlle Creff; Claude Vidaud; Georges Carle; Sabine Santucci-Darmanin
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Association of Bone Turnover Levels with MTHFR Gene Polymorphisms among Pregnant Women in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Shu-Yun Liu; Qin Huang; Xue Gu; Bin Zhang; Wei Shen; Ping Tian; Yun Zeng; Ling-Zhi Qin; Lin-Xiang Ye; Ze-Min Ni; Qi Wang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

5.  The Abundance of Trace Elements in Human Bone Relative to Bone Type and Bone Pathology.

Authors:  Rachel M Coyte; Jennifer S Harkness; Thomas H Darrah
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 6.  Review of Knowledge of Uranium-Induced Kidney Toxicity for the Development of an Adverse Outcome Pathway to Renal Impairment.

Authors:  Yann Guéguen; Marie Frerejacques
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.