Literature DB >> 18605570

Coastal strategies to predict Escherichia coli concentrations for beaches along a 35 km stretch of Southern Lake Michigan.

Meredith B Nevers1, Richard L Whitman.   

Abstract

To understand the fate and movement of Escherichia coli in beach water, numerous modeling studies have been undertaken including mechanistic predictions of currents and plumes and empirical modeling based on hydrometeorological variables. Most approaches are limited in scope by nearshore currents or physical obstacles and data limitations; few examine the issue from a larger spatial scale. Given the similarities between variables typically included in these models, we attempted to take a broader view of E. coli fluctuations by simultaneously examining twelve beaches along 35 km of Indiana's Lake Michigan coastline that includes five point-source outfalls. The beaches had similar E. coli fluctuations, and a best-fit empirical model included two variables: wave height and an interactive term comprised of wind direction and creekturbidity. Individual beach R2 was 0.32--0.50. Data training-set results were comparable to validation results (R2 = 0.48). Amount of variation explained by the model was similar to previous reports for individual beaches. By extending the modeling approach to include more coastline distance, broader-scale spatial and temporal changes in bacteria concentrations and the influencing factors can be characterized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18605570     DOI: 10.1021/es703038c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of conventional and alternative monitoring methods for a recreational marine beach with nonpoint source of fecal contamination.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Shibata; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Christopher D Sinigalliano; Maribeth L Gidley; Lisa R W Plano; Jay M Fleisher; John D Wang; Samir M Elmir; Guoqing He; Mary E Wright; Amir M Abdelzaher; Cristina Ortega; David Wanless; Anna C Garza; Jonathan Kish; Troy Scott; Julie Hollenbeck; Lorraine C Backer; Lora E Fleming
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Hydrometeorological variables predict fecal indicator bacteria densities in freshwater: data-driven methods for variable selection.

Authors:  Rachael M Jones; Li Liu; Samuel Dorevitch
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Space/time analysis of fecal pollution and rainfall in an eastern North Carolina estuary.

Authors:  Angela D Coulliette; Eric S Money; Marc L Serre; Rachel T Noble
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Systematic review of predictive models of microbial water quality at freshwater recreational beaches.

Authors:  Cole Heasley; J Johanna Sanchez; Jordan Tustin; Ian Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.