Literature DB >> 18605559

Biogeochemical processes in ethanol stimulated uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments.

Santosh R Mohanty1, Bharati Kollah, David B Hedrick, Aaron D Peacock, Ravi K Kukkadapu, Eric E Roden.   

Abstract

A laboratory incubation experiment was conducted with uranium-contaminated subsurface sediment to assess the geochemical and microbial community response to ethanol amendment. A classical sequence of terminal electron-accepting processes (TEAPs) was observed in ethanol-amended slurries, with NO3- reduction, Fe(III) reduction, SO4(2-) reduction, and CH4 production proceeding in sequence until all of the added 13C-ethanol (9 mM) was consumed. Approximately 60% of the U(VI) content of the sediment was reduced during the period of Fe(III) reduction. No additional U(VI) reduction took place during the sulfate-reducing and methanogenic phases of the experiment Only gradual reduction of NO3-, and no reduction of U(VI), took place in ethanol-free slurries. Stimulation of additional Fe(III) or SO4(2-) reduction in the ethanol-amended slurries failed to promote further U(VI) reduction. Reverse transcribed 16S rRNA clone libraries revealed major increases in the abundance of organisms related to Dechloromonas, Geobacter, and Herbaspirillum in the ethanol-amended slurries. Phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) indicative of Geobacter showed a distinct increase in the amended slurries, and analysis of PLFA 13C/12C ratios confirmed the incorporation of ethanol into these PLFAs. A increase in the abundance of 13C-labeled PLFAs indicative of Desulfobacter, Desulfotomaculum, and Desulfovibrio took place during the brief period of sulfate reduction that followed the Fe(III) reduction phase. Our results show that major redox processes in ethanol-amended sediments can be reliably interpreted in terms of standard conceptual models of TEAPs in sediments. However, the redox speciation of uranium is complex and cannot be explained based on simplified thermodynamic considerations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18605559     DOI: 10.1021/es703082v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  10 in total

1.  Microbial community changes in response to ethanol or methanol amendments for U(VI) reduction.

Authors:  Tatiana A Vishnivetskaya; Craig C Brandt; Andrew S Madden; Meghan M Drake; Joel E Kostka; Denise M Akob; Kirsten Küsel; Anthony V Palumbo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Microbial diversity in uranium mining-impacted soils as revealed by high-density 16S microarray and clone library.

Authors:  Gurdeep Rastogi; Shariff Osman; Parag A Vaishampayan; Gary L Andersen; Larry D Stetler; Rajesh K Sani
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  U(VI) reduction in sulfate-reducing subsurface sediments amended with ethanol or acetate.

Authors:  Brandon J Converse; Tao Wu; Robert H Findlay; Eric E Roden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Linking specific heterotrophic bacterial populations to bioreduction of uranium and nitrate in contaminated subsurface sediments by using stable isotope probing.

Authors:  Denise M Akob; Lee Kerkhof; Kirsten Küsel; David B Watson; Anthony V Palumbo; Joel E Kostka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Nitrate-Utilizing Microorganisms Resistant to Multiple Metals from the Heavily Contaminated Oak Ridge Reservation.

Authors:  Michael P Thorgersen; Xiaoxuan Ge; Farris L Poole; Morgan N Price; Adam P Arkin; Michael W W Adams
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Polar lipid fatty acids, LPS-hydroxy fatty acids, and respiratory quinones of three Geobacter strains, and variation with electron acceptor.

Authors:  D B Hedrick; A D Peacock; D R Lovley; T L Woodard; K P Nevin; P E Long; D C White
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Influence of uranium on bacterial communities: a comparison of natural uranium-rich soils with controls.

Authors:  Laure Mondani; Karim Benzerara; Marie Carrière; Richard Christen; Yannick Mamindy-Pajany; Laureline Février; Nicolas Marmier; Wafa Achouak; Pascal Nardoux; Catherine Berthomieu; Virginie Chapon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Coupling a genome-scale metabolic model with a reactive transport model to describe in situ uranium bioremediation.

Authors:  Timothy D Scheibe; Radhakrishnan Mahadevan; Yilin Fang; Srinath Garg; Philip E Long; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.813

9.  Fe-phyllosilicate redox cycling organisms from a redox transition zone in Hanford 300 Area sediments.

Authors:  Jason Benzine; Evgenya Shelobolina; Mai Yia Xiong; David W Kennedy; James P McKinley; Xueju Lin; Eric E Roden
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Gene Expression Correlates with Process Rates Quantified for Sulfate- and Fe(III)-Reducing Bacteria in U(VI)-Contaminated Sediments.

Authors:  Denise M Akob; Sang Hyon Lee; Mili Sheth; Kirsten Küsel; David B Watson; Anthony V Palumbo; Joel E Kostka; Kuk-Jeong Chin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.