Danuta Marona-Lewicka1, Benjamin R Chemel, David E Nichols. 1. Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences-RHPH, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Dr., West Lafayette, IN 47907-2091, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) differs from other types of hallucinogens in that it possesses direct dopaminergic effects. The exact nature of this component has not been elucidated. OBJECTIVE: The present study sought to characterize the effects of several dopamine D(4) agonists and antagonists on the discriminative stimulus effect of LSD at two pretreatment times and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), a selective 5-HT(2A/2C) agonist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained in a two-lever, fixed ratio (FR) 50, food-reinforced task with LSD-30 (0.08 mg/kg, i.p., 30-min pretreatment time), LSD-90 (0.16 mg/kg, i.p., 90-min pretreatment time), and DOI (0.4 mg/kg, i.p., 30-min pretreatment time) as discriminative stimuli. Substitution and combination tests with the dopamine D(4) agonists, ABT-724 and WAY 100635, were performed in all groups. Combination tests were run using the dopamine D(4) antagonists A-381393 and L-745,870 and two antipsychotic drugs, clozapine and olanzapine. RESULTS: WAY 100635 produced full substitution in LSD-90 rats, partial substitution in LSD-30 rats, and saline appropriate responding in DOI-trained rats. ABT-724 partially mimicked the LSD-90 and LSD-30 cues, but produced no substitution in DOI-trained rats. In combination tests, both agonists shifted the dose-response curve of LSD leftward, most potently for the LSD-90 cue. The D(4) antagonists significantly attenuated both the LSD-90 and LSD-30 cue, but had no effect on the DOI cue. CONCLUSION: Dopamine D(4) receptor activation plays a significant modulatory role in the discriminative stimulus effects in LSD-90-trained rats, most markedly for the later temporal phase of LSD, but has no effect on the cue produced by DOI.
RATIONALE: Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) differs from other types of hallucinogens in that it possesses direct dopaminergic effects. The exact nature of this component has not been elucidated. OBJECTIVE: The present study sought to characterize the effects of several dopamine D(4) agonists and antagonists on the discriminative stimulus effect of LSD at two pretreatment times and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), a selective 5-HT(2A/2C) agonist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained in a two-lever, fixed ratio (FR) 50, food-reinforced task with LSD-30 (0.08 mg/kg, i.p., 30-min pretreatment time), LSD-90 (0.16 mg/kg, i.p., 90-min pretreatment time), and DOI (0.4 mg/kg, i.p., 30-min pretreatment time) as discriminative stimuli. Substitution and combination tests with the dopamine D(4) agonists, ABT-724 and WAY 100635, were performed in all groups. Combination tests were run using the dopamine D(4) antagonists A-381393 and L-745,870 and two antipsychotic drugs, clozapine and olanzapine. RESULTS: WAY 100635 produced full substitution in LSD-90 rats, partial substitution in LSD-30 rats, and saline appropriate responding in DOI-trained rats. ABT-724 partially mimicked the LSD-90 and LSD-30 cues, but produced no substitution in DOI-trained rats. In combination tests, both agonists shifted the dose-response curve of LSD leftward, most potently for the LSD-90 cue. The D(4) antagonists significantly attenuated both the LSD-90 and LSD-30 cue, but had no effect on the DOI cue. CONCLUSION:Dopamine D(4) receptor activation plays a significant modulatory role in the discriminative stimulus effects in LSD-90-trained rats, most markedly for the later temporal phase of LSD, but has no effect on the cue produced by DOI.
Authors: J C Winter; D J Fiorella; D M Timineri; R A Filipink; S E Helsley; R A Rabin Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Elizabeth A Pehek; Christine Nocjar; Bryan L Roth; Tara A Byrd; Omar S Mabrouk Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Mikhail N Koffarnus; Gregory T Collins; Kenner C Rice; Jianyong Chen; James H Woods; Gail Winger Journal: Behav Pharmacol Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 2.293
Authors: Bruce E Blough; Antonio Landavazo; Ann M Decker; John S Partilla; Michael H Baumann; Richard B Rothman Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Jose I Juncosa; Martin Hansen; Lisa A Bonner; Juan Pablo Cueva; Rebecca Maglathlin; John D McCorvy; Danuta Marona-Lewicka; Markus A Lill; David E Nichols Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 4.418