Literature DB >> 18604535

Feasibility, cost-effectiveness and patients' acceptance of point-of-care INR testing in a hospital-based anticoagulation clinic.

Ming Chai Kong1, Teong Guan Lim, Heng Joo Ng, Yiong Huak Chan, Lai Heng Lee.   

Abstract

Point-of-care (POC) coagulometers are increasingly used by patients for self-monitoring of oral vitamin K antagonists therapy. We studied the feasibility of introducing POC international normalised ratio (INR) testing in place of standard laboratory assays in a hospital-based anticoagulation clinic with 250 active patients. The CoaguChek XS system was first validated in 253 INR samples and found to have a correlation of r = 0.945 with standard assays. Variations increased with INR readings above 3.5 and this was chosen as the cutoff for acceptance of POC INR results. POC testing was done for 1,332 clinic visits during the subsequent 6-month study. Rate of rejections of INR over 3.5 was 4.3% (95% CI 3.3-5.5%). POC testing reduced clinic visit duration by 35 min (p < 0.001, 95% CI 25-45) without cost increments to patients or the laboratory. Among 232 respondents surveyed, 87.5% (95% CI 82.5-91.5%) preferred POC INR monitoring. Rates of thrombosis and major bleeding complications were 1.2% (95% CI 0.2-3.5%) and 0.4% (95% CI 0.01-2.2%), respectively. In conclusion, provided mechanisms are in place to address increased variations of INR at higher ranges, POC testing can be successfully implemented in busy hospital-based anticoagulation clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18604535     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-008-0530-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  5 in total

Review 1.  Economic Evidence and Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Andrew St John; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2013-08

2.  Follow-up and management of valvular heart disease patients with prosthetic valve: a clinical practice guideline for Indian scenario.

Authors:  Devendra Saksena; Yugal K Mishra; S Muralidharan; Vivek Kanhere; Pankaj Srivastava; C P Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-01-28

3.  Patients' satisfaction associated with portable coagulometers for warfarin monitoring: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nicoletta Riva; Christian Borg Xuereb; Walter Ageno; Michael Makris; Alex Gatt
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Health Economic Evidence of Point-of-Care Testing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Deon Lingervelder; Hendrik Koffijberg; Ron Kusters; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2021-01-06

5.  Security and cost comparison of INR self-testing and conventional hospital INR testing in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement.

Authors:  Qiu-lin Chen; Li Dong; Yi-jun Dong; Shu-lin Zhao; Bo Fu; Yu-qing Wang; Hong Jiang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.