P Kafle1, M Maharjan, S Shrestha, K C Toran. 1. Department of Ear Nose Throat-Head Neck Surgery, Kathmandu Medical College, Sinamangal, Nepal. p_kafle@yahoo.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the efficacy of sub mucosal diathermy (SMD) and partial resection of inferior turbinate (PRIT) in the treatment of symptomatic enlarged inferior turbinates. STUDY DESIGN: prospective. METHODS: Forty patients of age group 18 -56 yrs with symptomatic enlarged inferior turbinates had given choices for SMD and PRIT. All the patients had history of failed medical treatment. RESULTS: Each twenty patients underwent SMD (group I), PRIT (group II), five pt of gr. I had to have anterior nasal packing after surgery for bleeding. Three pt complained of excessive rhinorrhoea for first 2 weeks while 3 pt of Group 1 complained of nasal blockage for 1 week even after intervention. In group 2, 5 pt had to have re-anterior nasal packing after pack removal. Both groups followed up for 6 months. Nine patients were lost in follow up, so excluded from the study. Following 6 months of follow up, 6 patient of gr. I had recurrence with nasal blockage and in gr. II none had recurrence. CONCLUSION: PRIT is better than SMD in long course; nevertheless it should be reserved for failed SMD, not as a primary option.
OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the efficacy of sub mucosal diathermy (SMD) and partial resection of inferior turbinate (PRIT) in the treatment of symptomatic enlarged inferior turbinates. STUDY DESIGN: prospective. METHODS: Forty patients of age group 18 -56 yrs with symptomatic enlarged inferior turbinates had given choices for SMD and PRIT. All the patients had history of failed medical treatment. RESULTS: Each twenty patients underwent SMD (group I), PRIT (group II), five pt of gr. I had to have anterior nasal packing after surgery for bleeding. Three pt complained of excessive rhinorrhoea for first 2 weeks while 3 pt of Group 1 complained of nasal blockage for 1 week even after intervention. In group 2, 5 pt had to have re-anterior nasal packing after pack removal. Both groups followed up for 6 months. Nine patients were lost in follow up, so excluded from the study. Following 6 months of follow up, 6 patient of gr. I had recurrence with nasal blockage and in gr. II none had recurrence. CONCLUSION: PRIT is better than SMD in long course; nevertheless it should be reserved for failed SMD, not as a primary option.
Authors: Se Hwan Hwang; Hye Kyung Cho; Sang Hi Park; WeonSun Lee; Hee Jin Lee; Dong Chang Lee; Sun Hwa Park; Mi Hyun Lim; Sang A Back; Byeong Gon Yun; Dong Il Sun; Jun Myung Kang; Sung Won Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 3.240