Literature DB >> 18603678

Study of a manual method of liquid-based cervical cytology.

Anita N Kavatkar1, C A Nagwanshi, S M Dabak.   

Abstract

We report a study of a manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC) method. Slides are prepared by using a polymer solution and allowing it to dry, forming a membrane. The aims of the study were to prepare cervical cytology smears using the manual method, observe morphology, compare with direct scrape smears and correlate with histopathology wherever possible. Out of 105 cases, the membrane was intact, indicating a good MLBC preparation, in 97 cases. Simultaneous conventional smears were taken in 81 patients. There was an 88.8% agreement in the diagnoses of general category in both groups. The diagnosis of negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) in both groups was made in 70 cases. The MLBC preparation was unsatisfactory in two cases which showed high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, respectively, on the conventional smear. One MLBC smear diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance was reported as NILM on conventional smear. Cytohistologic correlation was done in nine cases, all of which showed cervicitis on histopathology. The MLBC method was found to be comparable to the conventional scrape smear. Further study of this method as a cost-effective alternative to the mechanized methods would be worthwhile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18603678     DOI: 10.4103/0377-4929.41678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pathol Microbiol        ISSN: 0377-4929            Impact factor:   0.740


  9 in total

1.  Value of centrifugated liquid-based cytology by Papanicolaou and May-Grünwald in oral epithelial cells.

Authors:  Hussain Gadelkarim Ahmed; Ali Mahmmoud Edris; Eneel Ahmed Mohmed; Mohammed Omer M Hussein
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2009-07-22

2.  Comparison of specimen adequacy and smear quality in oral smears prepared by manual liquid-based cytology and conventional methods.

Authors:  Surabhi Shukla; A Einstein; Abhilasha Shukla; Deepika Mishra
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec

3.  Comparison of liquid-based preparation and conventional smear of fine-needle aspiration cytology of lymph node.

Authors:  Priya Singh; Manish Rohilla; Pranab Dey
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Role of p16/INK4a and Ki-67 as specific biomarkers for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: An institutional study.

Authors:  Ankitha Hebbar; Venkataramappa Srinivasa Murthy
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

5.  Comparative study between liquid-based cytology & conventional Pap smear for cytological follow up of treated patients of cancer cervix.

Authors:  Uma Singh; Sabuhi Qureshi; Neha Negi; Nisha Singh; Madhumati Goel; Kirti Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Comparative Analysis of Liquid based and Conventional Cytology Smears in Fine Needle Aspirates from Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Vasundhara Sharma; Veena Gupta; Padam Parmar; Promil Jain; Deepak Thakran; Rajeev Sen
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Diagnostic Utility and Efficacy of Conventional Versus SurePath® Liquid-based Cytology in Head and Neck Pathology: A Study in an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Sonam Sharma; Charanjeet Ahluwalia; Mukul Singh; Ashish Kumar Mandal
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2018-07-17

8.  Comparative evaluation of conventional cytology and a low-cost liquid-based cytology technique, EziPREP™, for cervicovaginal smear reporting: A split sample study.

Authors:  Ruchika Gupta; Ravi Yadav; Akhileshwar Sharda; Dinesh Kumar; Ravi Mehrotra; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.091

9.  Comparative study of manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC) technique and direct smear technique (conventional) on fine-needle cytology/fine-needle aspiration cytology samples.

Authors:  Prajkta Suresh Pawar; Rasika Uday Gadkari; Sunil Y Swami; Anil R Joshi
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.000

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.