R M Kauffman1, A K Ferketich, M E Wewers. 1. The Ohio State University College of Public Health, M-006 Starling-Loving Hall, 320 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. kauffman.57@osu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine current tobacco policy in US prisons and explore changes in prison tobacco policies over time. DATA SOURCE: Telephone survey of the 52 US departments of correction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current tobacco policy; distribution of free tobacco; availability of smoking cessation programming and cessation aids. PARTICIPANTS: Complete responses were received from 51 of 52 (98%) departments, while one provided partial information. RESULTS: The majority of correctional systems (60%) reported total tobacco bans on prison grounds, with most remaining facilities (27%) having an indoor ban on tobacco use. No prisons distributed free tobacco. No major violence was reported relating to the implementation of stricter tobacco policies; however many respondents noted that tobacco became a major contraband item following the implementation of a total ban. While most prison systems with an indoor tobacco ban (86%) reported having tobacco cessation programmes, few of those with total bans (39%) continued such programmes after the initial transition period. CONCLUSION: Total tobacco bans have often been accompanied by the termination of tobacco cessation programmes. Such actions undermine efforts to promote long-term cessation resulting in a missed public health opportunity.
OBJECTIVE: To examine current tobacco policy in US prisons and explore changes in prison tobacco policies over time. DATA SOURCE: Telephone survey of the 52 US departments of correction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current tobacco policy; distribution of free tobacco; availability of smoking cessation programming and cessation aids. PARTICIPANTS: Complete responses were received from 51 of 52 (98%) departments, while one provided partial information. RESULTS: The majority of correctional systems (60%) reported total tobacco bans on prison grounds, with most remaining facilities (27%) having an indoor ban on tobacco use. No prisons distributed free tobacco. No major violence was reported relating to the implementation of stricter tobacco policies; however many respondents noted that tobacco became a major contraband item following the implementation of a total ban. While most prison systems with an indoor tobacco ban (86%) reported having tobacco cessation programmes, few of those with total bans (39%) continued such programmes after the initial transition period. CONCLUSION: Total tobacco bans have often been accompanied by the termination of tobacco cessation programmes. Such actions undermine efforts to promote long-term cessation resulting in a missed public health opportunity.
Authors: Karen L Cropsey; Michael F Weaver; Gloria D Eldridge; Gabriela C Villalobos; Al M Best; Maxine L Stitzer Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Amy Y Hafez; Mariaelena Gonzalez; Margarete C Kulik; Maya Vijayaraghavan; Stanton A Glantz Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ross M Kauffman; Amy K Ferketich; David M Murray; Paul E Bellair; Mary Ellen Wewers Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Ross M Kauffman; Amy K Ferketich; David M Murray; Paul E Bellair; Mary Ellen Wewers Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Karen L Cropsey; C Brendan Clark; Erin N Stevens; Samantha Schiavon; Adrienne C Lahti; Peter S Hendricks Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2016-10-23 Impact factor: 3.913